Timon3

39 ms·

631.
by Timon3 2y ago
It seems I'm not the first person to make this observation: https://github.com/fabian-hiller/valibot/issues/687 I honestly don't want my validation library to "tell a story" at the expense
632.
by Timon3 2y ago
I'm not exactly sure myself, but every time I open one of the pages, I mentally stumble over the formulations. I think there are two components: 1. The biggest part is that I've simply never seen documentation written in this styl
633.
by Timon3 2y ago
Really? For example under "Main concepts" on the "Schemas" site[0], I see stuff like this: - I support the creation of schemas for any primitive data type. - Among complex values I support objects, records, arrays, tuple
634.
by Timon3 2y ago
I recently stumbled onto this when looking for alternatives, and though it might sound a bit extreme: the style of documentation means I'll never consider it for any project. It's strange and honestly somehow unnerving to read doc
635.
by Timon3 2y ago
The opposite of "some societal good" isn't "less societal good than other alternatives", it's "no societal good". The original statement didn't contain any comparisons. Even the worst alternative
636.
by Timon3 2y ago
I honestly can't imagine any reasonable person arguing that GPL/LGPL have brought absolutely no societal good. Are you thinking of anybody in particular?
637.
by Timon3 2y ago
> These links don’t make a good case Twitter/X has a publicly stated policy of following the laws in local jurisdictions. They refuse orders that violate the local laws. Yet the old Twitter fought and won against far more of these o
638.
by Timon3 2y ago
So... How exactly is this not openly preparing for a coup attempt? The Republicans have to this day not been able to procure evidence of election fraud, yet this resolution allows them to ignore the vote results if they think there's f
639.
by Timon3 2y ago
I haven't been able to find any. What absolutely shocked me is that even in America, apparently there has been no such test done by anyone besides Tesla. How did you come to your earlier assessment? Did you ignore the differences in ma
640.
by Timon3 2y ago
Have you been able to find safety statistics for pedestrian collisions? I tried looking them up, but was unable to find any. Naive comparisons like "the hood is lower" are not enough to make this kind of statement, as the remainin
641.
by Timon3 2y ago
> Hand conservatives an olive-branch and unite on election security. Or be complicit in making Jan 6th the new normal. Why don't conservatives try it the other way around? They could alleviate the concerns of the other side by first
642.
by Timon3 2y ago
It's not just about the ads, as GP said, it's the user hostility. If I buy a console from them, every day they could decide that they deserve to wring even more money out of me, through more and more intrusive ads and dark pattern
643.
by Timon3 2y ago
But why would that be an appropriate amount? By having the fine around the lowest possible investment to tackle the issue, you're literally incentivizing companies not to take security seriously. After all, you can save money early int
644.
by Timon3 2y ago
Why 10k-100k, how did you arrive at that amount? Meta put their customers at risk through negligent actions. A fine in the range you propose would be lower than any investment required to improve security (e.g. by hiring a single additional
645.
by Timon3 2y ago
I'm sure there are many physicists that share your opinions, but that's not really relevant - there are also many physicists that share the opposite opinion, and there's a lot of physicists that aren't knowledgeable on b
646.
by Timon3 2y ago
Do you have concrete examples of research that could be conducted if the money were invested into "space science"? I doubt that it would improve the speed of progress by much - ESA already has a budget of close to €8bn, and the in
647.
by Timon3 2y ago
I'm very uninformed on the topic, so thank you for the response. Based on the FCC Wikipedia article I do however think your premise is flawed: 1) you presume a collider only brings value if it can definitively prove/refute a theor
648.
by Timon3 2y ago
Do we currently have more promising experimental approaches to unveil new physics that are being ignored due to particle accelerators? My understanding is that we keep "building bigger and bigger synchrotrons" because it's re
649.
by Timon3 2y ago
No, this is simply not true. If you change "example-1.2.3.js" to "example-1.2.4.js" in the response to `/{resource}/{id}`, it does not change the underlying resource. The included script is simply a part of t
650.
by Timon3 2y ago
> Updating a JS library has nothing to do with idempotence. The JS libraries used in <script> tags by HTML pages are absolutely part of the resource. No, they absolutely aren't, and this is a really important distinction. Not
651.
by Timon3 2y ago
If the view counter is part of the resource itself, then yes, incrementing it on GET breaks the idempotence contract - but it should be obvious that by breaking idempotence, you're breaking idempotence. If it's part of the respons
652.
by Timon3 2y ago
Idempotency in the context of HTTP requests isn't about the response you receive, but about the state of the resource on the server. You're supposed to be able to call GET /{resource}/{id} any amount of times without t
653.
by Timon3 2y ago
> I agree with Elon on this. I don't think this is anti-semitic, this is calling out Jewish communities for anti-white racism. Musk apparently doesn't agree with this tweet anymore, a while after his tweet he apologized and cal
654.
by Timon3 2y ago
Although I disagree with the GP, neither of your arguments are fully thought through. > Plants feel distress too, we are just happily ignorant of it; not too different from people who are happily ignorant of the fact that meat doesn&#x27
655.
by Timon3 2y ago
Did you not see this exchange last year? > @breakingbaht: "Jewish communties have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them." > @elonmusk: &quo
656.
by Timon3 2y ago
It doesn't matter if you've worked on this at a different company, especially considering how much Musk changed about Twitter. You either know the reasons they were banned and restored or you don't - it's disingenuous to
657.
by Timon3 2y ago
And you know that how exactly? Do you work at Twitter? Are you responsible for banning/restoring accounts? You're making broad statements and assumptions that don't align with reality. The accounts were banned. You don&#x27
658.
by Timon3 2y ago
What state were they restored to? If they were accessible, why did they have to be restored? If you're going to argue "a ban doesn't count if it's reversed after a couple of hours", what's the threshold? Could
659.
by Timon3 2y ago
What are you referring to with "public companies"? As far as I'm aware, neither SpaceX nor Twitter are public.
660.
by Timon3 2y ago
Voter ID would be reasonable if everyone had them, or had free and very easy access to get them. Most countries have some kind of unified government ID, in Germany for example it's mandatory to own one of two kinds of government ID. Sa

More ›