Timon3

43 ms·

661.
by Timon3 2y ago
I've rarely seen people interested in protecting the climate without caring about those points. Usually disinterest in one seems correlated with disinterest in the other (especially politically). Are you referring to specific initiativ
662.
by Timon3 2y ago
Sadly, that's what happens when everything is treated as a resource in exchange for short-term gains. Employees, good will, any morals and ethics - all will be sacrificed on the altar of shareholder value.
663.
by Timon3 2y ago
Sure, that's my point. There is nothing inherent in short term contracts that makes employees less invested - that's your fault as a company.
664.
by Timon3 2y ago
> And this goes both ways. The contractor has not much incentive to perform well either. Can you explain your thoughts here a bit further? The short term contract can be renewed or replaced with a full time contract. This should provide
665.
by Timon3 2y ago
I'm not sure what gave you the impression that the single example I brought up was meant to be exhaustive. If you want examples that fit some specific definition of "tech company", please share that definition, or where one c
666.
by Timon3 2y ago
What about SAP?
667.
by Timon3 2y ago
Maybe this could also be implemented using variable fonts[0]. This would probably make it easier to configure in non-browser environments (once this is better supported by font selectors etc). [0]: https://developer.mozilla.org&#
668.
by Timon3 2y ago
Given enough time and resources, you'd be right, this would be sufficient. But remember the beginning of the movie - they explicitly stated that every year fewer crops could be harvested, which meant that most people had to work in foo
669.
by Timon3 2y ago
> But death is probably not a concept a cat understands. This is anecdotally wrong (see below), but also doesn't make much sense on its face. Why would social animals not recognize death? A dead animal poses many dangers to a social
670.
by Timon3 2y ago
I've only watched the first minute (due to the presentation style), if there is better evidence later please link to it directly - but the supposed evidence does not show anybody "shoving 100+ ballots into absentee boxes".
671.
by Timon3 2y ago
> and you can still jailbreak now if you want to. I can currently only jailbreak an iPhone due to mistakes made by Apple. It's conceivable that it won't be possible at some future point - though I'm not sure how this is re
672.
by Timon3 2y ago
Of course you could put apps on phones before app stores. Distribution etc. was harder, and most applications were much more limited (especially due to worse performance, network connection, and limited input methods), but a whole industry
673.
by Timon3 2y ago
Why, what trouble would we be in? And since we're apparently only dealing in absolutes - would we be in bigger trouble than we'd be in if no art, nowhere was kept for any amount of time?
674.
by Timon3 2y ago
This is a theory of mine for which I haven't specifically looked into evidence, so take it with a grain of salt - but I'm convinced that this is why storytelling exists, and specifically why the Hero's journey is so common: s
675.
by Timon3 2y ago
> Sick days, vacation, and parental leave are also good examples at a small scale. It definitely doesn't hold for every jobs, but if a person can be out of the job for days or weeks without a huge impact on the team it may very well
676.
by Timon3 2y ago
I understand that you can define a restricted grammar that will stay parseable, as the embedded language would have to adapt to those rules. But that doesn't solve the question, as Typescript already has existing rules which overlap wi
677.
by Timon3 2y ago
Thanks for the response, but I'm aware of the basics. My question is pointed towards making language parsers resilient towards separately-evolving standards. How would you build a JS parser so that it correctly parses any new TS syntax
678.
by Timon3 2y ago
I don't know a lot about parser theory, and would love to learn more about ways to make parsing resilient in cases like this one. Simple cases like "ignore rest of line" make sense to me, but I'm unsure about "adver
679.
by Timon3 2y ago
Where did I agree to anything? You're either not reading my messages correctly, or you're playing pre-programmed messages. Neither are part of an honest discussion.
680.
by Timon3 2y ago
> Once again, the military, who are sworn in to protect the constitution. Ah, so the military would have to remove the constitutionally appointed president from office (remember, the constitution doesn't specify the VP can't be
681.
by Timon3 2y ago
Again: why are you asking me this on an unrelated comment? I didn't tell you that an insurrection happened or did not happen, I told you that you were sharing misinformation when you said that the crowd "inconveniently forgot to t
682.
by Timon3 2y ago
Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that they showed no evidence and had no legal standing. I was solely focusing on the intended procedure - if you have issues with an election, the proper way to address them is through the courts, as h
683.
by Timon3 2y ago
I think it's important to correct misinformation on such important topics. Many people point to these wrong facts as evidence that things aren't that bad - which makes it even more important to correct things, as this apparently w
684.
by Timon3 2y ago
Oh, so you're just fully committing to bad faith? Don't let me stop you, but please be aware that is against the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
685.
by Timon3 2y ago
Really? How often do you stash weapons in close proximity to political events? How many weapons do you usually stash? I'm sure you are aware that I didn't ask whether you own weapons as a hobby. Since we're interacting in goo
686.
by Timon3 2y ago
I don't have to know the exact plans to disprove your claim that "they all forgot their guns that day". Some people brought guns, and some people specifically stashed guns close by. I mean, why do you think guns were stashe
687.
by Timon3 2y ago
> However, I just cannot see asking Pence to delay certification as trying to end democracy Trump didn't ask Pence to delay certification, he asked him to count the fake electors prepared by Republicans instead. What is the end of d
688.
by Timon3 2y ago
While I disagree with your portrayal of the election changes, you are right that Trump challenging the result was justified. But when his challenges failed and it was clear that Biden won fair and square, there was no justification for at
689.
by Timon3 2y ago
Because, due to the actions of a few brave people, they didn't get the chance to use them on any politicians. Let me turn this around - why lie about such an easy-to-check fact? Even RFK has stopped pushing this, why do you continue wh
690.
by Timon3 2y ago
> Not totally normal... just not an insurrection. Again, it's not that it was a great honorable thing to do, just that calling it an overthrow of the entire government is hyperbolic and has been pushed as a narrative for political p

More ›