Tiberium

22 ms·

301.
Experimental Nvidia Driver (Turing+) for Haiku OS(discuss.haiku-os.org)
7 points by Tiberium 10mo ago|1 comments
302.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Unfortunately HN changed the direct link to the post: https://discuss.haiku-os.org/t/haiku-nvidia-porting-nvidia-d... Release link: https://github.com/X547/nvidia-haiku/releases/tag/
303.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Do people who contribute to YouTube Shorts get paid a lot? It's a very nasty thing in the current form.
304.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Yeah, I know, I just feel like at this point it's useless to call that out.
305.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
> What I needed was not a better app, but a way to tolerate imperfection without the whole system falling apart. > Claude did not invent that idea. It executed it. > Claude handled implementation. I handled taste. This style of wri
306.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Right now it seems like the project is just a thin wrapper over Brave Search. Building a complete search engine is way harder than that. You could look into using https://github.com/MarginaliaSearch/MarginaliaSearch if
307.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
A small correction: Opus 4.5 is included in the Pro plan nowadays, but yeah, the usage limits for it on the $20 sub are really, really low.
308.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
It's https://theaidigest.org/village which runs different models with computer access, so Opus 4.5 got the idea to send that email.
309.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
I get that the water stereotype is funny, but it gets tiring after a while (because it's not actually true).
310.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
There's also Nim, it shines even more in compile time and has proper compile time macros :)
311.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Yes, that's exactly what I'm referring to. When you're using the direct Gemini API (AI Studio/Vertex), with specific tricks you can get the raw reasoning/CoT output of the model, not the summary.
312.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
There are tricks on the API to get access to the raw Gemini 3 CoT, it's extremely easy compared to getting CoT of GPT-5 (very, very hard).
313.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
The frontend examples, especially the first one, look uncannily similar to what Gemini 3 Pro usually produces. Make of that what you will :) EDIT: Also checked the chats they shared, and the thinking process is very similar to the raw (not
314.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
From a tweet: https://x.com/i/status/2001821298109120856 > can someone help folks at Mistral find more weak baselines to add here? since they can't stomach comparing with SoTA.... > (in case y'all
315.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
I was talking about Gemini 3 Flash, and you absolutely can disable reasoning, just try sending thinking budget: 0. It's strange that they don't want to mention this, but it works.
316.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
For 2.5 Flash Preview the price was specifically much cheaper for the no-reasoning mode, in this case the model reasons by default so I don't think they'll increase the price even further.
317.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Yes, but also most of the increase in 3 Flash is in the input context price, which isn't affected by reasoning.
318.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
You can still set thinking budget to 0 to completely disable reasoning, or set thinking level to minimal or low.
319.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
I would be less salty if they gave us 3 Flash Lite at same price as 2.5 Flash or cheaper with better capability, but they still focus on the pricier models :(
320.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Yet again Flash receives a notable price hike: from $0.3/$2.5 for 2.5 Flash to $0.5/$3 (+66.7% input, +20% output) for 3 Flash. Also, as a reminder, 2 Flash used to be $0.1/$0.4.
321.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
At least you can play a lot of the Pico-8 games through the website for free - their player shows virtual controller buttons, although for some games it can be awkward.
322.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
The only table where they showed comparisons against Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3: https://x.com/OpenAI/status/1999182104362668275 https://i.imgur.com/e0iB8KC.png
323.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
They did compare it to other models: https://x.com/OpenAI/status/1999182104362668275 https://i.imgur.com/e0iB8KC.png
324.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Can you please share the relevant code that has the training of such a tiny student model that can operate independently of the big teacher model after training? The repository has no such code.
325.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
The fake claim here is compression. The results in the repo are likely real, but they're done by running the full transformer teacher model every time. This doesn't achieve anything novel.
326.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
I might be overly pessimistic, but this looks like a case of a person believing LLM hallucinations and making it write a paper. I asked both Claude Code|Opus 4.5 and Codex|GPT 5.1 Codex Max (funny to ask LLMs, I know) to check the an1-core
327.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
Unfortunately it does indeed seem like a case of "So You Think You've Awoken ChatGPT" https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2pkNCvBtK6G6FKoNn/so-you-thi... (not directly, but similar enough) EDIT: Found a
328.
by Tiberium 10mo ago
I'm honestly grateful to those who disclose their use of AI in replies, because lately I've noticed more and more of clearly LLM-generated comments on HN with no disclaimers whatsoever. And the worst part is that most people don&#
329.
by Tiberium 11mo ago
The article mentions this: > So it kind of cheated, though it clearly felt angst about it. After trying a few ways to get the stars to line up perfectly, it just gave up and copied the screenshot in as the background image, then overlaid
330.
by Tiberium 11mo ago
It looks to me that you're generating your comments entirely with LLMs? Lots of the general stylistic choices look very LLMish, especially looking over your history. A lot of "interesting point" repetitions too. Plus this com

More ›