Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Throwawayaerlei
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Meteor Lake/Intel 4 would then be six years late if the wccftech.com article's commentary on the two nodes was correct. Good to hear about the presentation material, thanks!
92.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Intel has a decades long history of very poor top level engineering management. They got petrified about the issue of how much DRAM they'd be able to put in a system in the 1990 (remember Rambus RDRAM?), and among the consequences was
93.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
"[TSMC is] an important company that is gonna get their lunch eaten by the mainland." How so? Not for the foreseeable future in bleeding and leading edge nodes, where the PRC is some unknown but very long distance away from makin
94.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
"The management textbooks [at my business school] used to tell you that steady profits were the most important thing." That's stark raving mad. It is for example one of the clearest signs someone is running a Ponzi scheme.
95.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
I think your citation is 9 years old. What I've always heard is what they called 10 nm was non-EUV. You are correct that what they called 7 nm was going to use EUV, pretty much had to, but 10 nm catastrophically failed and the compan
96.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Did not read TFA and if it doesn't focus a lot on the 10 nm/Intel 7 botch it's not fine, but I've read TSMC's very roughly equivalent 7 nm node was also non-EUV but less aggressive than Intel's. And it succeed
97.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
An exception to the trope doesn't "put it to rest," except of course for that exception. For Intel the interim CFO made CEO was actually executing a strategy that might have worked. I was pretty sure Gelsinger would be a c
98.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
HN discussion on this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32291356
99.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
That was the Secret Service, not that I would expect the FBI to have been more aware.
100.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
> Managing low performers is a magnitude more work than solid performers; no manager would do this to themselves on purpose. It would be easier to cut their 2 least rockin' stars. Then what do you do a year (and a half for Amazon) l
101.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Vehicle users don't give a damn about the price of crude oil except to the extent it makes the fuels they use like Diesel more expensive. Our biggest problem is refinery capacity, it's down 1 million barrels per day or 5% from b
102.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
The plain Quaker oatmeal I buy in 42 oz canisters is 50% more expensive than it was 10 months ago. I can come up with more examples that have nothing to do with meat or animal protein if you'd like. One thing you're ignoring is t
103.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Would be more accurate to say un-updated phones are unlocked doors you know are unlocked. Up to date? Slow update cycles measured in weeks suggest for some portion of some number of cycles they're also unlocked. Worse is how some f
104.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
For a few more details, US refinery capacity is down 5% or 1 million barrels per day from pre-COVID figures, so once the economy started unfreezing from that demand exceeded supply. Worldwide it's 3 million bpd. For the US, a signifi
105.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Perhaps worth noting poultry and especially chicken eggs are subject to truly transitory inflation due to the current avian flu outbreak: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020%E2%80%932022_H5N8_outbrea... Have not checke
106.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
"The reality is that the boosters only work for 3 months" Nope, they make lasting, as far as we know permanent changes to your immune system as almost all vaccines do (TDaP to bacterial toxins an obvious exception). You may be tal
107.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
That's obviously not on the US agenda, we're not getting huge numbers of doses of either kind manufactured. We are getting more JYNNEOS doses, and distributing doses of I assume it, and again with the assumptions so it can be use
108.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Pretty sure you can figure out why, but if you deny this line of vaccines that are the oldest in existence from variolae vaccinae, Jenner's Latin for "smallpox of the cow," you deny everything called a vaccine. Given that t
109.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
The APC higher end "Smart-UPS" models might still be good, I've used them for a couple of decades without these sorts of problems, current 750 kVA one bought in 2017, just had to replace the battery at its prompting only a mo
110.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
The problem with your thesis the people who own guns in this county are not the ones being made angry with these three decisions.
111.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Your last sentence isn't supported by history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_switch_in_time_that_saved_... Plus of course aligned with your first sentence FDR got reelected after that. Twice. I rate these dec
112.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Appears to be mostly honest, for example does not count as "teens" those over 17, but it doesn't capture the by far highest fraction of defense gun uses, those in which the weapon is never fired (over 85%, maybe over 90%; as
113.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
You are of course correct that no changes to the facts on the ground will happen quickly, and if you assume New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen does not get enforced, maybe not even in New York state but like MacDonald
114.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Those two fit together very well, this isn't an either/or. 43 states with 74% of the nation's population having Shall Issue or better concealed carry regimes tells us the former option is not disastrous ("better": h
115.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
"Though, for most homes, all a lock will do is keep out the people who don't want to be there in the first place. They can be good if you don't want someone snooping around without you noticing, but unless you go out of your
116.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
Works for me....
117.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
It's an opportunely for them to prove they're not bald faced liars, or living in a bubble if in the US, or if outside the US as so many are, to admit they in fact do not know anything above the slogan level of the topics under dis
118.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
You make wild but unfortunately all too popular claims about the state of things at the time the Second Amendment and its prequels were written, going all the way to repeating a claim completely unsupported by history. I suggested you read
119.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
The point is the Anti-Federalists said "No Bill of Rights, we won't observe the Constitution." Starting with New York I think this was made an explicit contingent condition of their ratification of the Constitution. Thus a
120.
▲
by
Throwawayaerlei
4y ago
"nearly no brand new weapon systems developed after year 2000 are bought by US allies" Could you enumerate a few more of them than the obviously ludicrous M777? And does that count as "brand new"?? What about the Stand
More ›