ThrowAway99122

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ThrowAway99122 7y ago

   The most relevant section of US criminal law I'm told is 1030 6a which reads: >(6) knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics (as defined in section 1029) in any password or similar information through which a computer may be a
2. 2.▲
   by ThrowAway99122 7y ago

   I'm sure they did have a solid basis. The FBI statutes referenced are forfeiture related and don't describe the underlying crime they are accused of, and I'm not familiar with UK or NL law where the accused are located. USA i
3. 3.▲
   by ThrowAway99122 7y ago

   Guy mentioned in the article here using a throwaway (I'm active on this site). Never went to trial, never went to prison, charges were withdrawn. > An investigation by infosec journalist Brian Krebs claimed that a second suspect, a