Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TheMode
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
So if we encouraged people to make such terms to help with their end of month, looking at people would become immoral? Pieces of paper/text shouldn't be able to dictate what is moral outside of common sense. The world I describe a
32.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
What if I say "I spent a lot of time on my appearance, if you look at me you should pay". Do I have the right to bill anybody making eye contact?
33.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Because these websites create expectation. If everyone is using YouTube, won't you be missing something by not going? If you started using the service when you felt it was great and it deteriorated since, would it really be unfair to f
34.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
> You talk as though this has already happened, but that's not the case. Companies pay Google with money they hope to recoup from you via your purchases, but whether or not you choose to buy the thing advertised is completely up to
35.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Companies pay Google with the money they got from you. They aren't getting "attention" they are getting future potential sales which will fund the next advertising round. > I don't think Google would have ever gotten
36.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
I mean, if Google gets its revenue solely from ads. Doesn't it mean that you are paying for the ads you see? I would rather have all google products be paid, and lessen the incentive for business to spend a large share of their revenue
37.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Is it even desirable to store data for millennia? What's wrong with humans wanting to destroy knowledge? As you said culture is probably the best method of preservation. But still fallible, and this may be a good thing!
38.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
How expensive is it to produce? Is it overwritable?
39.
▲
Feeel- Haptic Handheld Concept
(jasminkappler.com)
2 points
by
TheMode
3y ago
|
0 comments
40.
▲
The future of software, the end of apps (2013)
(pchiusano.github.io)
2 points
by
TheMode
3y ago
|
0 comments
41.
▲
A World Without Apps (2019) [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
TheMode
3y ago
|
1 comments
42.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Is there any high end 5/7nm SBC? Phone chips don't seem to escape the phone market.
43.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
> Seatbelts don't need to be worn by good drivers, because they won't get into accidents! All humans are fallible, but it may be out of your control. There is no other human between you and your device. > Yes. Because some
44.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
It is also due to how unstable software is. Is it possible nowadays to write a simple calculator function and ensure that nobody will ever need to care again for the rest of the century? Making software stable (including for example the web
45.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Because we write extensible instead of composable software. We do not distribute functions, but apps. How many instructions do you need in assembly to compute `1+1`? How many instructions do you need to open your search bar, get the calcula
46.
▲
Marblepunk – Fictional Programming Language
(esolangs.org)
2 points
by
TheMode
3y ago
|
0 comments
47.
▲
“Weathering Software Winter”, Handmade Seattle 2022 [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
TheMode
3y ago
|
0 comments
48.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
There is also a problem with how apps are made, they depend way too much on environment calls. And obviously adding 50 permissions isn't realistic. Now, making the base process manual doesn't mean that the user will need to do the
49.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Personally I am not advocating for "protection", protection against what? Your own device? Why is your device harming you to begin with? The online data privacy crisis isn't really about data or the bad actors, but the lack o
50.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
That's understandable, and so perhaps that we need to re-think our computing model to replace yes/no popups with something a bit more involving. By "involving" I do not necessarily mean harder, the goal isn't to mak
51.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
It is easier to build automation on top of a simpler/manual/secure process, than it is to make a fully automated system secure. I am not saying that automation shouldn't be possible at all, but that platforms shouldn't b
52.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
What app developers want/do is irrelevant. I am saying that it should be impossible for any individual app to access or connect to anything without explicit user consent. We need to stop automating everything and then complain that com
53.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
I assume that it is dependent on the platform, and what you are accessing. The problem is that we first design platforms/APIs to automate everything, and secondly try to make it secure/explicit. We need the opposite.
54.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
> No Consent. Under the ePrivacy Directive, the mere access or storage of data on the user’s terminal device is only allowed if users give their free, informed, specific and unambiguous consent. Two out of the three mobile apps did not d
55.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
ISAs aren't stable. Can you guarantee me that programs will be compiled for x86 in 20y? What instructions will they output to access the environment? Linux, Windows, MacOS? Will any of these even remain in 20y? No standard last forever
56.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
Software maintenance shouldn't exist. Instead of fighting the source code to map the current trendy environment, we should compile our programs to easily interpretable formats that does not contain any environment specific code and the
57.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
The OS is the layer below applications. They obviously can control what data is being sent. Now perhaps that our software model doesn't make it very convenient, but blaming Apple is completely honest and understandable. We should stop
58.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
I am not convinced that the climate change argument will result in any concrete action. You can yell as loud as you want, most won't be able to understand the supposed impact of their action. Instead of trying to synchronize humanity a
59.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
I am not saying that this is low effort either, the website itself probably took some time. I am saying that a lot of this effort is pointless. To be clear, not because the developer is bad (I did not try it outside of the website demo), bu
60.
▲
by
TheMode
3y ago
I am not complaining about this specific developer, I said the state of software development. In an ideal world, this app should be programmable in the same time it takes to read the website and buy it. Not questioning the reasons why such
More ›