TheGirondin

9 ms·

31.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
I can't even imagine being that fragile that seeing a gendered pronoun would be upsetting.
32.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
I addressed all of these points in my last comment, which you are apparently going to just ignore so you can try to deflect to something else. Have a nice life.
33.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
My comment was based on the arguments of pro-immigration people, and their desire for "virtually unlimited immigration." So yes, the position of pro-immigration people is relevant. Views on illegal migrants are relevant because if
34.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
So what limits do you want want put on immigration? What steps would take to prevent people from coming a country like the US or the UK illegally? What would you do with people who are there illegally? If you like most pro-immigration peopl
35.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Do you have anything to support that claim?
36.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
I said "virtually unlimited." Try not deliberately taking me out context next time.
37.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
I have the opposite reaction to this. The open borders crowd has been insistent that Western nations don't have enough poor people to work low skilled jobs, so they argue we need to import them in mass from other countries. But, as you
38.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
I wasn't aware HN had a policy of discouraging women from answering questions that are asked in those threads. Seems like a terrible thing that needs to change.
39.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>they would probably switched to a back-up plan (say, putting bombs in laptops for instance ;) I actually used to think the same way, until I mentioned how silly some of these security theatre steps seem within earshot of someone who did
40.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
When reading comments like these, I can't help but wonder what the public response would have been if the government had taken action against a vague hijacking threat in Aug-Nov of 2001.
41.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Anyone who was born in the US is not an immigrant.
42.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
What a surprise, a request for citation of an outrageous anti-Trump claim results in an avalanche of irrelevant links.
43.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Says the person who wants them to all come to the US. "I agree with that [immigration is a net benefit to nearly everyone] and support more or less open borders" - yummyfajitas
44.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
This is sarcasm, right?
45.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Ok, so that's the template that make fake news legitimate. 1) Get a dossier from an anonymous source claiming X did Y. According to you, it doesn't even have to exist. 2) Report on the existence of the dossier, making sure to clic
46.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Has it honestly not occurred to you that he might treat him with disrespect and disdain because they earned it? Just as one example, CNN was reporting on that fake new about the "golden showers."
47.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
2016 elections: Republican 63,153,387 Democratic 61,776,218 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Represe...
48.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
The difference was the the men in the study were experiencing those side effects at an order of magnitude higher than men do, plus there was huge increase in suicides.
49.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
OH defiantly was swing state - Real Clear Politics had them switching sides frequently.
50.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
The oil boom in ND drew thousands of medium skill workers for very high paying jobs that could not go to illegals. If the people in CA are not willing to pay their maids fair market wages, then maybe they can do their own fucking dishes.
51.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>How long until someone on the Trump side starts sending spam to all of these addresses? Never.
52.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>> This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period, both in-person and around the globe >If "in-person" doesn't mean "physically at the inauguration" what does it mean then? It is not
53.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>but we have no evidence that he's actually doing that. He has been President for exactly 5 days now.
54.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Because it show the duplicitous nature of people like you. Clearly this wasn't an issue Hillary, so it's obvious that is all political nonsense.
55.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>Trump would set up the surveillance state (as he threatens to do) These kind of comments really underscore how little credibility the anti-Trump crowd has, given the context of the last 8 years.
56.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
What does this have to do small government?
57.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
>It will take at least a decade or two to free up the FM band for other uses anyway. Norway will probably wait and use it in a way that aligns with the rest of the world, rather than finding its own local use for the spectrum. And that&#
58.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
And yet Trump is meeting with people who own newspapers that have been working against him.
59.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
Please go in to some detail on how the actions of Congress excuse the actions of the President.
60.
by TheGirondin 10y ago
It's ok if the other does it?

More ›