4 ms·

So what limits do you want want put on immigration? What steps would take to prevent people from coming a country like the US or the UK illegally? What would yo

So what limits do you want want put on immigration? What steps would take to prevent people from coming a country like the US or the UK illegally? What would you do with people who are there illegally? If you like most pro-immigration people, my guesses are A) almost none (certainly no hard caps on numbers), B) almost nothing, C) rather than deport them, instead give them drivers licences and social welfare benefits. When you take everything into account, their position is that they want virtually no limits on immigration.

Oletros 10y ago
> So what limits do you want want put on immigration? I didn't asked about limits or not, I asked you proof about your claim that NOW in the UK there is "virtually unlimited immigration". You have not answered. > What steps would take to prevent people from coming a country like the US or the UK illegally? What has to do illegal immigration with this thread? This article talks about LEGAL workers > If you like most pro-immigration people, You don't know what I think because I didn't write about my opinions about immigration. I just asked one claim done by you without any proof to back it. > When you take everything into account, their position is that they want virtually no limits on immigration. Opinion that has nothing to do with your actual claim. Or perhaps is that you're confused and think that "European migrants" are illegal migrants
- TheGirondin 10y ago
  My comment was based on the arguments of pro-immigration people, and their desire for "virtually unlimited immigration." So yes, the position of pro-immigration people is relevant. Views on illegal migrants are relevant because if they don't care about limiting illegal immigration, they sure as heck don't want limit legal immigration. It's kind of telling that instead of responding with "that's not what we believe," the response has been sophistry and trying to deflect.
  - Oletros 10y ago
    > My comment was based on the arguments of pro-immigration people, and their desire for "virtually unlimited immigration." Nobody has done that in this subthread. And, by the way, your claim was there is "virtually unlimited immigration", still waiting an argumentation about your claim. >It's kind of telling that instead of responding with "that's not what we believe," the response has been sophistry and trying to deflect. Yes, it is telling because it is what you have done in this thread, I have asked about your claim that there is virtually unlimited immigration right now and your answer have talking about hypothetical arguments from other people. You don't have any proof and you only think other people wants it. So, I won't waste more time with your no-answers
    - TheGirondin 10y ago
      I addressed all of these points in my last comment, which you are apparently going to just ignore so you can try to deflect to something else. Have a nice life.

Oletros 10y ago

> So what limits do you want want put on immigration? I didn't asked about limits or not, I asked you proof about your claim that NOW in the UK there is "virtually unlimited immigration". You have not answered. > What steps would take to prevent people from coming a country like the US or the UK illegally? What has to do illegal immigration with this thread? This article talks about LEGAL workers > If you like most pro-immigration people, You don't know what I think because I didn't write about my opinions about immigration. I just asked one claim done by you without any proof to back it. > When you take everything into account, their position is that they want virtually no limits on immigration. Opinion that has nothing to do with your actual claim. Or perhaps is that you're confused and think that "European migrants" are illegal migrants

TheGirondin 10y ago
My comment was based on the arguments of pro-immigration people, and their desire for "virtually unlimited immigration." So yes, the position of pro-immigration people is relevant. Views on illegal migrants are relevant because if they don't care about limiting illegal immigration, they sure as heck don't want limit legal immigration. It's kind of telling that instead of responding with "that's not what we believe," the response has been sophistry and trying to deflect.
- Oletros 10y ago
  > My comment was based on the arguments of pro-immigration people, and their desire for "virtually unlimited immigration." Nobody has done that in this subthread. And, by the way, your claim was there is "virtually unlimited immigration", still waiting an argumentation about your claim. >It's kind of telling that instead of responding with "that's not what we believe," the response has been sophistry and trying to deflect. Yes, it is telling because it is what you have done in this thread, I have asked about your claim that there is virtually unlimited immigration right now and your answer have talking about hypothetical arguments from other people. You don't have any proof and you only think other people wants it. So, I won't waste more time with your no-answers
  - TheGirondin 10y ago
    I addressed all of these points in my last comment, which you are apparently going to just ignore so you can try to deflect to something else. Have a nice life.