TheCleric

10 ms·

91.
by TheCleric 2y ago
That sounds fine in theory, but who decides which teams are remote? How do you avoid a situation where someone comes on a remote team and gets the rug pulled out when someone else decides that team is now in person?
92.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I can only speak for my company, but we interview every qualified candidate. Sure we may get 100s of applicants per position but 90% easily don’t read the job description and are just blasting out a resume trying to get hits. The remaining
93.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I think hybrid is fine if they mean "if you want to have an office, fine. if you want to wfh, fine." Which is how I took their comment.
94.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Of course they would. Or at least I would. Why would I come into an office when I can just apply on a full-time remote position? Then again I have been full time remote since 2018, and the company I am with now has been full time remote eve
95.
by TheCleric 2y ago
It will if they are at 150% of 2022 attendance (which they were in 2024).
96.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Are there any cars with just regenerative braking and not friction braking? If so I’m unaware of those.
97.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Without a mechanical redundancy: pass.
98.
by TheCleric 2y ago
To me it depends on your goals: Do you want to use it to power versioning and CI? Do you want commits traceable to tickets/issues Do you want to do merge commits or squashes? Do you want to generate change logs from the commits? Differ
99.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Yeah I'd take this with a HUGE grain of salt: Next, when examining whether responses written by ChatGPT and therapists were rated higher, lower, or equal in line with the common factors of therapy, we found a large and reliable d
100.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Yeah but if people aren't doing their jobs you coach them or get rid of them. Turning it into a situation where you blame the method and not the people abusing it just makes you look foolish.
101.
by TheCleric 2y ago
In my experience, mostly themselves.
102.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I agree it’s no easy task. It seems to me though, as an outside observer, that writing virtually no enforced policy is the lazy way to go about it. Write a policy, stick to your guns, have a procedure for changing it if you get it wrong.
103.
by TheCleric 2y ago
It’s all open source and therefore mostly unpaid volunteer driven, but it doesn’t really feel like there is truly a policy. Every week we see a story here about a kernel maintainer complaining about Rust and Linus refusing to actually apply
104.
by TheCleric 2y ago
It can probably become a science heavyweight simply by being here at the moment when science funding in the USA is about to collapse.
105.
by TheCleric 2y ago
At this point, this is the wrong question to ask. The correct question is: if this is illegal what are the possible consequences and when would they be enforced? Musk has shown time and again whether it is legal or not isn’t very important
106.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I choose death. Thanks.
107.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I think one of the reasons developers roll their “own” crypto code is because there doesn’t really seem like a simple “do it this way” way to do it. OpenSSL has hundreds of ways of doing encryption. So it almost has pitfalls by default, bec
108.
by TheCleric 2y ago
In banking not only can this be common, sometimes it can be legally mandated. For example I can definitely see this rule being in place to prevent money laundering.
109.
by TheCleric 2y ago
I am so confused why you’d trade the OLED screen for the XReal glasses which seem like an extra complication for no upside.
110.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Heck I’ve seen some nastiness on LinkedIn with people’s government name and employer right next to it. Real names don’t do much to prevent online assholery.
111.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Overly aggressive use of the term “computard” is at best unserious and at worst deeply offensive.
112.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Maybe the solution will be for tools like uv or poetry to warn if dynamic metadata is used and strongly discourage it. Then over time the users of packages that use dynamic metadata will start to urge the package authors to stop usin
113.
by TheCleric 2y ago
It’s not censors. It’s fellow users collectively voting on what we want in our community and what we don’t. (Didn’t downvote or flag it as it was dead when I got here)
114.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Thanks for that excellent write-up!
115.
by TheCleric 2y ago
The problem right now is to either get it from or to Twitter requires API access and that's not cheap.
116.
by TheCleric 2y ago
As far as I know BlueSky does support did:web https://atproto.com/specs/did
117.
by TheCleric 2y ago
The blog post should more accurately be titled “You too can write a textbook”
118.
by TheCleric 2y ago
Stuff like this is why I refuse to use Windows anymore.
119.
by TheCleric 2y ago
BlueSky’s big selling point is no algorithm by default. It’s default timeline is users you follow in descending chronological order. You can use an algorithm (called a feed) if you like. They provide a few, but also are open about their pro
120.
by TheCleric 2y ago
It’s not just that. If I say something that people find derogatory, and they do not want to associate with me because of that, that’s THEIR first amendment right. There can always be social consequences for speech that is legal under the fi

More ›