Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TheBlight
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
451.
▲
by
TheBlight
10y ago
ITT: True Believers of the Church of The Singularity
452.
▲
by
TheBlight
10y ago
I see a bunch of 1x'ers are getting their chuckles at this one..../s
453.
▲
by
TheBlight
10y ago
LN doesn't even exist. There's no design for how it will function at scale as dishonestly advertised.
454.
▲
by
TheBlight
10y ago
I've been coding primarily in Go for the last year or so. Previously some Ruby and lots of C/C++. I actually don't like coding in it very much. It's far too much typing and boilerplate stuff. I'd love to just be abl
455.
▲
Help Tabetha Boyajian's team catch KIC 8462852 in the act of dimming
(kickstarter.com)
1 points
by
TheBlight
10y ago
|
0 comments
456.
▲
by
TheBlight
10y ago
To move the coins in a P2PKH output the signature also needs to include the public key.
457.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
This seems pretty pointless.
458.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
Yeah that part wasn't super realistic. A good dictionary file would've cracked that bad boy in less than an hour.
459.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
Excellent summary. Conflicting business interests are probably playing a non-trivial role in the acrimony as well, e.g. limiting the block size makes solutions from businesses like Blockstream a bit more compelling whereas businesses like C
460.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
If it weren't for this film I don't think I would've really bothered much with computers.
461.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
Yeah, interesting attempt at revising history there but the title of the email which debuted Bitcoin to the world was titled: "Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper." It was designed to eventually compete with Visa, Paypal, etc. See also: h
462.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
This is FUD. You contradict yourself with your own statement. If any fork happens it would require a super-majority of hash power to support it -- the fork would be considered canonical Bitcoin and there would be no problem and no loss of f
463.
▲
by
TheBlight
11y ago
To add: the designer of the system explicitly pointed out the system was intended to be ruled by the majority: "It is a global distributed database, with additions to the database by consent of the majority, based on a set of rules the