This is FUD. You contradict yourself with your own statement. If any fork happens it would require a super-majority of hash power to support it -- the fork woul

This is FUD. You contradict yourself with your own statement. If any fork happens it would require a super-majority of hash power to support it -- the fork would be considered canonical Bitcoin and there would be no problem and no loss of funds. It's even questionable calling it a "fork" as there really wouldn't be a material side-branch.