Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
TerrifiedMouse
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
I wonder how many products have components that downgrade under specific situations and they never explicitly tell the customer - and most customers don’t ask because it’s “complicated tech” they don’t want to know about it.
92.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Why did Altman bring him onboard in the first place? What value does he provide? If there is a conflict of interest why didn’t Altman see it? If this Quora guy is the cause of all this, Altman only has himself to blame since he is the reaso
93.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
The worst thing humanity can do is create a competitor for resources for itself. You do not want AI with survival instincts similar to ours. AI need to be programmed to be selfless saints or we will regret it.
94.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> that doesn't exist and may never exist It doesn’t exist until suddenly it does. I think there are a lot of potential issues we really should be preparing for / trying to solve. For example, what to do about unemployment. We c
95.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
OK, most people have a price. The 3 board members and the remaining workers are outliners. You don’t have to buy all of them, just most of them. But they were able to get somewhere because … > The choice they're making to leave is s
96.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Money changes people. Especially when it’s a lot of money. They got used to the money and they want it to keep flowing - the charter be damned. Everyone has a price.
97.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
You compromise a few influential people in the organization to get a foot in the door and ultimately your money - which you control. Your money will do the rest.
98.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
You compromise the “few” to get a foot and your money in the door. After that, money will work its magic.
99.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Why did you think 700 signed on? Money. Who let the money in? Altman.
100.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Guess OpenAI that was actually open was dead the moment Altman took MS money and completely change the organization. People there got a taste of the money and the mission went out the window. A lesson to learn I guess, just because somethin
101.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> which is why their best case scenario was them being the benevolent dictatory gatekeeping AI. That seems like a fool's errand, even before they accepted MS's money, with Google, Facebook, and even Amazon in play. To be an ind
102.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Can't help but feel it was Altman that struck first. MS effectively Nokia-ed OpenAI - i.e. buyout executives within the organization and have them push the organization towards making deals with MS, giving MS a measure of control over
103.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Is their deal with Microsoft exclusive tech transfer wise? If not they can always sell/license what they have to Google, Facebook, and Amazon. They should be able to get quite a bit of money to last a while.
104.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> It’s a bit tragic that Ilya and company achieved the exact opposite of what they intended apparently, by driving those they attempted to slow down into the arms of people with more money and less morals. Well. If they didn’t fire him,
105.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> This could be the healing of the cancer that OpenAI brought to this field to make it closed as a whole. I don’t know. The damage might be permanent. Everyone is probably going to be way more careful with what information they release a
106.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
And everything Google does is in its self interest or prioritizes its self interest. Altruism falls by the sidelines.
107.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
I always figured it’s because HN is run by Y Combinator, a technology startup accelerator, so inevitably many of the folks here will be more pro entrepreneurship than non-profit.
108.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Better to have a small but independent voice that can grow in influence then being shackled by commercial interest and lose your integrity - e.g. How many people actually gives a shit what Google has to say about internet governance?
109.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
If you are hungry you go find food and eat it. If you are bored you go find something fun to do. Most of our actions, if not all, are to satisfy one need or another. Satisfying that need is the goal.
110.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
You are still goal-oriented. If you are hungry, you go look for food then consume said food if you find any. If you are bored, you look for entertainment - e.g. calling one of your friends (who isn’t a complete bore). It doesn’t have to inv
111.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> The only real virtue of LP vinyl is that it largely prohibits loudness war nonsense. Actually the loudness war started in the 40s with vinyl. https://www.npr.org/2009/12/31/122114058/the-loudness-war
112.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> And at which point do people accept that this is the level at which plenty of humans operate? I think you underestimate humans. One thing that humans (and many animals) are that LLMs aren’t, is goal-orientated. We are capable of recogn
113.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> isn't worth the effort of writing code to detect these non-discernible artifacts Why wouldn’t it be worth it? You just have to write the code once and it will affect terabytes of music being compressed from that point forth.
114.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> 1. These companies have bottom-of-the-barrel moral standards and don't care what one person on Twitter is Tweeting. This has to be political manoeuvring of some sort. Or they just don’t want their brand associated with such posts.
115.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Well at least we can damage the watermark such that it’s no longer machine readable. Since according to its marketing it’s invisible to listeners, our distortion of it should be equally invisible.
116.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Clearly people in the non-profit part are trying to bring the organization back to its non-profit origins - after Altman effectively high jacked their agenda and corporatized the organization for his own benefit; turning its name into a mem
117.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> This makes no sense. People are calling what the board did a coup, but Altman is trying (failing?) to stage a coup. I think he stage his coup long ago when he took control of OpenAI making it “CloseAI” to make himself richer by effecti
118.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
> Compression tends to discard high-frequency signals since they use the most bits. Quite certain that’s not true. We drop everything pass 20khz simply because it’s outside the average person’s hearing range. We drop everything under 20h
119.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Statistics as defined by training data. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-...
120.
▲
by
TerrifiedMouse
3y ago
Frankly, if it can be detected, it can be removed. Makes sense no?
More ›