TeeWEE

47 ms·

481.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Google is using its cash cow, search to fund lots of new innovative projects. If you break it up, you lose lots of innovation. I do think that they should prevent Google from killing nice startups by copying their services (hardly ever happ
482.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I really like this approach. I never liked any cross platform solution such as Cordova or Xaramin. The approach google is taking is a best-of-both-worlds approach: - Latest uix on the native platforms - Shared model layer in the apps I woul
483.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
You are not getting the quality native ui's using xaramin. Its always a common-denominator ui. Thus lacking new native features.
484.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
When I started go, i also thought it was nuts. And it indeed clutters your code a lot. But in the end, i like it. Golang is a really simple language, but all the simple concepts, and the lack of OOP, forces you to think more about your code
485.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Thats indeed a good point. The question remains. How often should you redesign your app? Sometimes an innovation (such as touch screens) forces you to rethink the uix.
486.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
It also decreases your user satisfaction from my experience. Writing a full native app, versus an cordova based app is still a world of difference. So for business apps, data input apps etc, cordova is fine, but dont try writing your next k
487.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
In Appengine web requests often kick of tasks in queues todo the heavy lifting. This makes the response of web requests very fast. However you dont need queues when you need synchronous results, or whenever the task is small.
488.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I thinks this guy is missing the point. Google did uix research and come up with a more usable design philosophy, which makes all apps more consistent. They are now executing those grand-design rules. In the end, apps should be more familia
489.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Imho types should make the programmer live easier, not more difficult. Looking at the first code, and at the second peace of code. Imho the second piece of code is easier to read, but it does lack validation logic & testing. First of a
490.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I kind of disagree with this article. With go its so easy to get started with http that most of the time you dont even need a framework. If you do, most good frameworks use the following function as a common basis: func(http.ResponseWri
491.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Its the de-facto standard for android development these days. And its very stable in my experience.
492.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Interesting, But i installed the app on my nexus 5 and used it... It feels like i'm opening the browser. The app doesn't feel native. Input elements are weird. The dialog is weird. The animation is sluggish. And the spinner animat
493.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Indeed. That's what i try to say. I think the knowledge regarding the shadow-dom and true standards-based web-components is not widely spread yet among devvers.
494.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I'm not saying React is a hack. I'm saying that all libraries that try to provide true "web components" that hide their implementation details for the user, are only achievable trough a "shadow dom" implementat
495.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
While I like the project and effort put into this, I think, if you considering using this project, you should also look at google's own polymer project. Its based on the industry standard web-components. https://www.polymer-
496.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Omg. Java is getting crippled. The language was never designed with lambda's in mind. And now we have Java 8 with "not-really-lambdas" But some kind of interface magic. Its just ugly as hell.
497.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
In amsterdam this is also happening to my knowledge. The main reason is that the city center is becoming too expensive for native-amsterdammers with a medium income to live. Lots of high-income (often expats) are willing to pay more for liv
498.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
While i like the animation, the fact that you have to "drag" your finger over the screen, to "tap" on a button, seems weird to me.
499.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Note that dowloading an app (.exe for windows, or an apple app) and running it, is just as bad. Downloading an installer, and running it, is also insecure. So the question is... What is the proper alternative? I think the best alternatives
500.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
While i agree with most of your points. I'm an veteran android engineer learning iOS. And i have to say, the xcode storyboard functionality makes it very easy to write a simple app. However you have to learn all the drag-n-drop options
501.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Well its not that weird actually. When i drive the first time over an unknown route i make quite some mistakes. Because i just dont know the route. I miss signs etc. If you drive a route very often, you learn about the route, and you learn
502.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I think there are two explanations. 1) One explanation is that, often unexperienced people start doing programming, start looking for a job, but after 1 or 2 years, they just know its not their cup of thee. Lots of people try learning progr
503.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I just ask them to call me in the evening. Its imho NOT OK to due it during your working day. If they don't want to call you at the time you will be suggesting, then it's not a position worth going for.
504.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
While not really a framework, i've getting used to using webapp and appengine's ndb datastore (yes its an appengine application). The application doesn't serve html, only json (its basically an api). The our app is build as a
505.
Scala – The Good, the Bad and the Very Ugly [presentation](techblog.bozho.net)
2 points by TeeWEE 12y ago|0 comments
506.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
I'm a python developer myself. I just started with Go. I'm just saying that Go fits microcontrollers better. Its cool to use Python. It doesn't matter much. I'm just saying that cool would also have been a good fit.
507.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
First of all, if you want to use python, use it. However go is imho more suitable since - Python doesnt do parallel programming well, Go does (and low level programming is often async) - Go compiles to machinecode already (it will be faster
508.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Well, writing in Go is just as nice as writing in Python in my opinion. But I understand the whole point of these are to support python. Thats ok.
509.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
Its cool. But a language like Go would be much better suitable for these microcontrollers.
510.
by TeeWEE 12y ago
The article points you you can run the following code to check you are affected: env X="() { :;} ; echo busted" /bin/sh -c "echo stuff" However... This just shows that the bash installation has this pr

More ›