TeapotNotKettle

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 6mo ago

   Maybe - but if that’s the case you are likely using the wrong data structure. Additionally you are going to be memory starving every other thread/process because you are hogging all the memory channels, and making an already bad L3 cac
2. 2.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 6mo ago

   Very interesting work. But practically speaking, in a real application - isn’t any performance benefit going to be lost by the reduced cache hit rate caused by having a larger working set? Or are the reads of all-but-one of the replicas non
3. 3.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 6mo ago

   “Burn old fella burn”, felt like political speech - but that didn’t work out so well.
4. 4.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 7mo ago

   So you were wrong?
5. 5.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 7mo ago

   And in each of those 62 cases they gave up there and then ? Tells you something
6. 6.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 8mo ago

   Misconfigured clown - bad news indeed.
7. 7.▲
   by TeapotNotKettle 8mo ago

   “ Perhaps my old age and fearfulness deceive me, but I suspect that the human species - the unique species - is about to be extinguished, but the Library will endure: illuminated, solitary, infinite, perfectly motionless, equipped with prec