Teandw

11 ms·

91.
by Teandw 4y ago
All the funds raised would become loans to Twitter -- So Twitter as a company would repay those loans.
92.
by Teandw 4y ago
All that shows is that you don't have the slightest idea on how companies are valued?
93.
by Teandw 4y ago
What examples do you have then?
94.
by Teandw 4y ago
You can fight for freedom of speech while still wanting people to not say things/do things that you feel puts your personal life at risk. Freedom of speech has to come with some caveats or its dangerous as it can be used as a weapon.
95.
by Teandw 4y ago
Imagine someone stood outside your house and tweeted every time you left your house. They're not doing anything wrong, anyone can walk down the street and see if you leave your house. Would you be happy knowing that all the criminals i
96.
by Teandw 4y ago
He's billionaire cash poor which is a lot different to our cash poor.
97.
by Teandw 4y ago
People have always engaged with other people like they do on Twitter. You don't think even before social media there was a world where people spread lies about you, spread hatred and people who would do anything in their power to ruin
98.
by Teandw 4y ago
When it comes to a situation like this, you can't just say you 'feel' that is the true value. They'd have to have something to back that up.
99.
by Teandw 4y ago
It's required for legal purposes. If legal notices are served on the domain, the registrars need to know where to send them. Using fake details are fine until you need to prove ownership for some reason or a legal notice is given. Easy
100.
by Teandw 4y ago
If trading hacked emails wasn't illegal, you'd have legitimate and big businesses trading them. You don't see any businesses like that because it is infact illegal. As someone else mentioned, an 'access device' actu
101.
by Teandw 5y ago
They focus on payment information as those are the most serious crimes and would provide the harshest sentence. Trading hacked emails does not carry the same weight as trading hacked credit card details.
102.
by Teandw 5y ago
What doesn't add up?
103.
by Teandw 5y ago
He knew what he was doing was illegal. You don't go through all the steps he did to stop authorities taking down the website without knowing what you're doing is illegal.
104.
by Teandw 5y ago
He was running one of the most 'successful' illegal forums for what 7 years? When you get away with something for so long, especially in an 'industry' where you know every law enforcement in the world is after you, I can
105.
by Teandw 5y ago
I think you may have just read the timeline of events incorrectly as what was said makes perfect sense? This was a multi-country investigation. The USA were likely already aware of Coelho so when he entered the US, he was then arrested by U
106.
by Teandw 5y ago
They don't need to hook an IP to a tracking code for this sort of testing? From what they've said it's very basic information they're looking to collect. "This installer was downloaded on X date. The installer was t
107.
by Teandw 5y ago
That's not how GDPR works. This isn't gathering personal data, PII or anything similar so wouldn't fall under the scope of GDPR.
108.
by Teandw 5y ago
This seems more like an issue where the Dr was giving you correct advice but you weren't hearing what you wanted to hear? Why would you infuriated by a Dr telling you to go outside more to increase Vitamin? That's exactly what the
109.
by Teandw 5y ago
Is the 5-10% savings on agents handling phone calls worth it when reputation damage is taken into consideration?
110.
by Teandw 5y ago
I refer to this specific situation.
111.
by Teandw 5y ago
Imgur, Photobucket and Animoto aren't comparable to Giphy. They're targeting different things. That would be like comparing Youtube to LinkedIn. Both social websites but ultimately have different goals/aims. What makes Giphy
112.
by Teandw 5y ago
You don't have economic power when you're breaking the law. (Generally)
113.
by Teandw 5y ago
1) "But this regulatory ruling isn't even about Facebook's dominant business, it's about the potential harm to the advertising business" Yes, using it's dominance to control a market and decide where people get
114.
by Teandw 5y ago
You don't understand how valuable data is to companies like Meta etc. Things like Giphy are amazing data builders. Think of all the cookies that get placed around the web for FB to use, when a giphy is embeded on a website. Even the ty
115.
by Teandw 5y ago
Threating to pull out of the UK would have no effect for this matter. The CMA are basically saying that FB are breaking competition laws, so need to sell. They wouldn't able to say "Well, you're breaking the law but because y
116.
by Teandw 5y ago
Why is it automatically a problem on their end? Maybe your monitor brightness is turned up too high. It's perfectly fine on my monitor. More to the point, the people that are generally visiting their website are not the sort of people
117.
by Teandw 5y ago
This is only affecting Amazon in this instance as it's caused by Amazon's tax avoidance schemes. If they weren't deep into tax avoidance schemes, this wouldn't have affected them. Not really due to Brexit. Nice attempt a
118.
by Teandw 5y ago
That's not how narcissism works. Otherwise, based on your way of thinking, anyone that has a life saving treatment is a narcissist, as they're having the treatment to live longer. Also, the company he's invested in isn't
119.
by Teandw 5y ago
In fairness, living longer has both positive and negative effects. So it's understandable why some people would complain about it.
120.
by Teandw 5y ago
What about this makes him a narcissist? Seems a random thing to throw into the mix. Just because people do things differently to you and make different decisions to the ones you would, doesn't automatically make them bad or a narcissis

More ›