TankeJosh

6 ms·

1.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Thanks for sharing, this is really helpful info! In its current form, infra.new would probably be most helpful when setting up new projects or migrating any old apps to this single monorepo setup, but it also sounds like Terraform isn'
2.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Maybe we should add a special agent mode to help with planning internal politics strategy ;) I am curious what the handoff looks like between you and the devs you work with. Do they self-serve using the modules you publish? Or is there some
3.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Thank you for the kind words! Would love to hear your thoughts if you have a chance to try it.
4.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Yeah I don’t love the token-based pricing either, not sure if we'll keep it long term. In practice you won't hit these limits, and if you do then you're probably a power user and we'll happily give you free quota in exch
5.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Appreciate the detailed feedback and definitely agree that wrapping these cloud services is a bad idea. Our last product did this and it went exactly how you described. Our goal isn’t really to make deploying “easy” per se, we mainly want t
6.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
There are definitely a lot of dragons, but there are also a lot of teams that use these tools and need help slaying those dragons :) We chose to focus on IaC because we think general coding agents are going to take a long time to solve all
7.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
100% agree with everything you’re saying here. This tool is designed to make the infra / DevOps person more effective by spending less time on tedious tasks and instead focus on the high level architecture and cost of their infrastruct
8.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Do you mind sending me an email with your chat ID so I can dig into it? josh@launchflow.com
9.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Ideally both. The agent is really good at keeping environment and module configurations separate, which IMO gets rid of a lot of the common headaches. What sort of breakages have you experienced with Terraform?
10.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
We’d like to add more background maintenance / optimization features after we get the 0→1 use case solid. The agent can do some basic analysis using its workflow tool + cloud CLIs, but it's definitely not designed for anything bey
11.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Its on the roadmap! The current plan is to add CDK docs / static checks after we finish adding Kubernetes support.
12.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Sorry about that, there's a race condition in the client that occasionally happens when claiming your guest chats. Reloading the page should fix it.
13.
by TankeJosh 1y ago
Thank you for the feedback! Would love to hear your thoughts when you have a chance to try it.
14.
Launch HN: Infra.new (YC W23) – DevOps copilot with guardrails built in
55 points by TankeJosh 1y ago|35 comments
15.
by TankeJosh 2y ago
I appreciate it! Feel free to email me at josh@launchflow.com if you hit any issues!
16.
by TankeJosh 2y ago
I have not used Coolify before, but after looking at their docs I would say LaunchFlow is somewhere between Coolify and Terraform / Pulumi. Similar to Terraform / Pulumi: you can define nearly any AWS / GCP resource with a li
17.
by TankeJosh 2y ago
Hey HN, We spent the last 6 months refactoring our DevOps platform into an open source deployment tool for AWS / GCP. If you’re not familiar with LaunchFlow, it's a Python SDK that lets you launch websites, APIs, and workers to AW
18.
Show HN: We just open sourced our deployment tool for AWS and GCP(github.com)
4 points by TankeJosh 2y ago|5 comments
19.
Show HN: Deploy Python apps to GCP or AWS with one line of code(launchflow.com)
2 points by TankeJosh 2y ago|0 comments
20.
by TankeJosh 2y ago
Was hoping for more feedback, I'll try again in the future!
21.
Show HN: LaunchFlow – Automate Your GCP / AWS Infrastructure with Python(launchflow.com)
8 points by TankeJosh 2y ago|1 comments
22.
by TankeJosh 2y ago
Hey HN! We just relaunched LaunchFlow, an infrastructure-from-code tool that automatically deploys infrastructure to your own GCP / AWS account as you use it in your Python code. Our tool is currently focused on making it easy to build
23.
Introducing LaunchFlow (YC W23): A better developer experience on GCP and AWS(launchflow.com)
3 points by TankeJosh 2y ago|1 comments
24.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
We're thinking about attending this year's conference, so maybe we'll see you there :)
25.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
AWS support is in the queue, but we only have GCP services at the moment. What services on AWS do you need access to? We can move them to the front of the queue to help out. Feel free to reach out even if this doesn’t work with your timelin
26.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
You can think of BuildFlow as a lightweight alternative to Flink / Spark Streaming. These streaming frameworks are great when you want to react to events in realtime (i.e. you want to trigger some processing logic every time a file is
27.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
We chose not to reference them because we are mainly focused on streaming use cases, which don't fit well in the prefect & dagster models.
28.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
Notebook execution should already work! The flow.run(...) call returns the output collection with this use case in mind. We're currently working on a docker manager module which will let users easily dockerize / run their pipeline
29.
by TankeJosh 4y ago
Thanks for the catch! We just pushed a fix.