Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SwoopsFromAbove
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
SwoopsFromAbove
9mo ago
And is the electric one intelligent? :p
2.
▲
by
SwoopsFromAbove
9mo ago
I also cannot calculate the square root of 472629462. My pocket calculator is not intelligent. Nor are LLMs.
3.
▲
Does my toaster love me?
(tomrenner.com)
2 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
1y ago
|
1 comments
4.
▲
Optimising for Trust
(tomrenner.com)
2 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
1y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
SwoopsFromAbove
1y ago
This is how I approach the tools too. I believe it’s a healthy approach, but who’s to say whether I’m just a naysayer. shrug
6.
▲
by
SwoopsFromAbove
1y ago
100%. Not a new phenomenon at all, just the latest bogeyman for the inevitabilists to point to in their predestination arguments. My aim is only to point it out - people are quite comfortable rejecting predestination arguments coming from e
7.
▲
LLM Inevitabilism
(tomrenner.com)
1773 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
1y ago
|
1628 comments
8.
▲
Saying the quiet part out loud
(tomrenner.com)
1 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
3y ago
|
1 comments
9.
▲
Cull your dependencies
(tomrenner.com)
143 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
4y ago
|
125 comments
10.
▲
by
SwoopsFromAbove
5y ago
You see, this sounds really cool. So what kinds of problems fit COBOL? And why did "we" conclude from this that general purpose languages were the solution, rather than building many different languages for specific problems? Did
11.
▲
Does the software industry learn?
(tomrenner.com)
69 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
5y ago
|
99 comments
12.
▲
Dora? I barely know her Coming to grips with DevOps metrics
(tomrenner.com)
2 points
by
SwoopsFromAbove
5y ago
|
0 comments