Sweyla

4 ms·

1.
by Sweyla 12y ago
I realize now that this is a historical document and not newly written, so I understand it was a different time back then. However, just for the sake of argument, let's say that it had been newly written. In that case the point isn&#x2
2.
by Sweyla 12y ago
I see. I had the impression it was newly written in a retro style. This makes a lot more sense now and I can appreciate it as a historical document.
3.
by Sweyla 12y ago
That's great in isolation, but the overall score is extremely low here. The ones where the programmer is explicitly male are 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6.3, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 8.2, 8.3. In many of the ones where the
4.
by Sweyla 12y ago
With not a single mention of a female programmer (but many he's and him's), I can't get behind this. Let's be an inclusive community, please.
5.
by Sweyla 12y ago
Here is my immediate suggestion: Show only one palette at a time. By putting incompatible patterns so close, you get a matrix of colors that with high probability do not harmonize well. I am assuming you have a slightly different algorithm
6.
by Sweyla 13y ago
Try this implementation for PAVA: https://gist.github.com/gustavla/9499068 Also, how are you timing Python? When I run this on a sample size of 10 using IPython's %timeit, it takes a few microseconds, which is 2 o
7.
by Sweyla 13y ago
No kidding the Active Set solution in Cython is slow, it barely leverages Cython at all! It uses a Python list which is managed by Python and uses none of Cython's static typing. Implement the algorithm inside a "with nogil"
8.
by Sweyla 13y ago
Thanks! So glad to hear that!
9.
by Sweyla 13y ago
Really cool. I hadn't seen this game before, but the idea is dear to my heart since a few years back I developed a similar iOS app called Circuit Coder. Sorry for the shameless plug, but if you're into games like this, it might be
10.
by Sweyla 17y ago
This is correct, well investigated!