Supply5411

9 ms·

1.
by Supply5411 3y ago
I've left this place a few times as it's gotten progressively worse. Then I rejoin after some time off, and it's even more warped and hostile to new users.
2.
by Supply5411 3y ago
The project that I'm known for, sh.py, was launched on HN 12 years ago, dig up the post if you're interested.
3.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Yes, I know that. Where did I say differently? I said the threats are being normalized. If a world power is telling their citizens that it's happening, whether its actually happening or not, then that is the process of normalization.
4.
by Supply5411 3y ago
I made no reference to burner accounts, but thanks for tying that into your not-so-subtle accusation against me. I've been here since 2011. Want proof of my identity, check my bio on Github[1] This is exactly what I'm talking abou
5.
by Supply5411 3y ago
MSM wants to pretend that nobody realizes their purpose is to push disinformation to everyone, all the time. So they clutch their pearls when "the other side" does it. Sorry, MSM, your credibility is in the toilet. You're all
6.
by Supply5411 3y ago
What claim? I'm quoting the article and saying its ridiculous that racial bioweapon threats are becoming normalized.
7.
by Supply5411 3y ago
>shouldn’t it be on the AI company to train using legally acquired content in the first place I don't think so. It's not illegal to look at or learn from copyrighted materials. If you start producing the materials it becomes a
8.
by Supply5411 3y ago
The problem is inseparable from the system, because people are involved.
9.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Makes sense, since you can use real money to buy reddit accounts with good reputation.
10.
by Supply5411 3y ago
If a model generates large amounts of text that is very close to something you've written, because there isn't much else like it, how is that "inspired"? It needs more dilution.
11.
by Supply5411 3y ago
DMCA 2024 - A nice big report button for when generated content is too close to copyrighted content. It is then on the AI company to supplement the training materials around that content, to dilute the generation of content that could be se
12.
by Supply5411 3y ago
There is much more freedom when they don't have to work to support a lie though. I'd rather a dishonest person or company have to put in a lot of work to defraud someone, than to have no scrutiny whatsoever.
13.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Yeah these are good points, and I think a lot of the complicated details would need to be worked out in practice. >What about positions that are considered negative value usually called "cost centers". I think if finance people
14.
by Supply5411 3y ago
I think you're having a kneejerk reaction to the first sentence. Read the rest of the post, where I propose how workers could be protected by less controlling laws.
15.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Is your point that having a new consideration clause to enforceable employment contracts is as impossible as a person breathing underwater? Not that you think it's a bad idea, just that it can't be done?
16.
by Supply5411 3y ago
I don't agree with criminalizing long commutes, nor do I agree with the minimum wage, which is a similar overstep from the government into employer-employee relationships. However, I agree with the spirit of both (protecting a worker),
17.
by Supply5411 3y ago
A company would avoid hiring people with long commutes, and people with long commutes would most likely be the ones who need the job the most. So you've hurt poor people further.
18.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Human life, I thought it was pretty obvious that we were talking about humans, since men and women can't produce ants.
19.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Because the production of life in a loving relationship between a man and a woman is the best way to produce life.
20.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Because it is the only combination that produces life.
21.
by Supply5411 3y ago
A case for why men need fathers? These Kafkaesque lines of questioning don't make it clear what people are actually upset about or want to learn more about.
22.
by Supply5411 3y ago
So it seems you're not interested in evidence of the thing you claim to seek, because you're not willing to define what would convince you, so that I can use that to find materials that fit your criteria. Ok, have a nice day :)
23.
by Supply5411 3y ago
>Alright, so it's not genitals I said genitals is "a required component of the arrangement." It's just not the whole thing.
24.
by Supply5411 3y ago
It sounds like you're upset that I am pointing out the obviousness of thing you're requiring evidence for, and you're jumping to my use of sarcasm as a technical rule break to threaten reporting me. I'll make my point wi
25.
by Supply5411 3y ago
It sure seems like a trick question, because it seems like you want me to define man and woman in a way that you can say "ha gotcha." Instead, I'm leaving the definition of man and woman to you, and only requiring that you kn
26.
by Supply5411 3y ago
How is AB different from AA or BB? Is this a trick question?
27.
by Supply5411 3y ago
>the comradery and care two adults can have for each other can be reflected into children no matter the gender of the adults who serve as examples. The love between a man and a woman is unique and no other arrangement replicates it.
28.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Got me, I totally made up this brand new social idea that men need fathers. It's so new and cutting edge that nobody has ever researched it or looked into it.
29.
by Supply5411 3y ago
I tried to read this with an open mind to learn something that may help me on a similar journey. However, I found it challenging to get any new nuggets of advice or wisdom. Maybe the "#buildinpublic" movement and interacting with
30.
by Supply5411 3y ago
Might be a worthwhile tradeoff. Less efficient model but a clear control interface, versus more efficient model but it's a blackbox.

More ›