Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Stronico
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
I thought I had given consideration. I do not regard "I don't know" as giving up. Giving up would be not finding the answer eventually. I certainly don't find myself "under" some other person if they know th
62.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
As a recruiter or an employer? I've only done "employer type" interviews.
63.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
The interview is there to provide more information about a possible relationship. Winning an interview is like winning a date (assuming you want a relationship with the other person.).
64.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
Any interview (of mine) is a conversation - they're not something you pass or fail - it's just a way for a potential employer and employee to get to know one another so they can make better decisions. Nobody won, lost, passed or
65.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
Largely because they were making things up and changing the subject instead of answering honestly.
66.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
Interviews are certainly bidirectional - and should be conducted as conversations, not third degree interrogations. I would walk out on that too. How is being asked something you don't know the answer to being pushed to the breaking p
67.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
So far it's worked very well for me. Since I've started using it (admittedly my sample size is small) I've found some very effective programmers, and automatically filtered out a lot of egotistical types. Software is usuall
68.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
Saying "I don't know" is an accurate answer. The ability to ask meaningful questions is a big part of any programming job. And (in my opinion) harder to learn than any particular technology.
69.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
When interviewing people I usually push until I get the candidate to answer "I don't know" on SOMETHING, just to see if they can do it. Not everyone can, and a lot of people will happily come up with a technical word salad t
70.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
I'm working on something to track stuff like that. What would you consider evidence of a study being disproved?
71.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
It would not be inflationary - inflation is a monetary phenomenon - not a fiscal one. Wages might go up, which results in higher prices, but that is not the same thing as inflation (which is a GENERAL increase in prices and fall in the pur
72.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
Addendum 6. When you make architectural decisions (creating some function in code instead of sql for example) go ahead and explain your reasoning to the client in some form or fashion. Volunteer this casually at a meeting. It creates a g
73.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
1. I would read "The Secrets of Consulting" by Gerald Weinberg The biggest lesson (I think it was in that book) was that you're being hired as an expert on a topic. to be a Successful expert you must A) have an expert level
74.
▲
by
Stronico
7y ago
I thought the same thing!
75.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
I heard it pretty constantly, over the whole college experience actually. It just seems irresponsible not too.
76.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
An open question to people born after 1980 - did you hear "what will you do with that degree" early and often? The end career was an important part of the decision making process when I started college, harped on by parents, advis
77.
▲
Law of the instrument
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
Stronico
8y ago
|
0 comments
78.
▲
Columbus Lowered World Temperature
(marginalrevolution.com)
1 points
by
Stronico
8y ago
|
0 comments
79.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
What margin of error did you have with the sinclair method, like if you were off an hour or two with taking the naltrexone would that matter? Also - did you have any withdrawal symptoms?
80.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
Asking in the wrong place, please ignore
81.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
How is this different from Blazor?
82.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
You Can't Win by Jack Black - autobiography of a small-time safecracker in the late 19th and early 20th century. Long enough ago for everything in life to be different, not long enough ago for everything in life to be incomprehensible
83.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
My grandfather went there in the late 20s-early 30s, graduating with degrees in economics and woodworking IIRC. As I recall he described education there as very much a group effort - working together was a bonding and binding experience.
84.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
And to clarify the "wary" part - the higher the charisma the less skeptical you will be of the person you're negotiating with.
85.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
It's just something I've noticed over the years. Personal charisma as it relates to sales/persuasion/compliance correlates with peripheral vision. I went through a period in 2012 where I did more negotiating (car buying
86.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
1. Never combine invoices - accounting bugs are difficult to spot and even harder to agree on. 2. Eye contact and thanking people mean more than you might think 3. Be wary of sales/persuasion people with good peripheral vision
87.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
That is pretty cool.
88.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
They actually adjust the prescription to optimize for near vision.
89.
▲
Ask HN: Does anyone wear special glasses for programming?
4 points
by
Stronico
8y ago
|
5 comments
90.
▲
by
Stronico
8y ago
I was wondering that too. Mormons would be a good subject group as well.
More ›