StrLght

3 ms·

1.
by StrLght 15d ago
I don't think they are, and given amount of votes on each — seems like so does the community. Regarding Lenovo: it's the first laptop with AirJet, sure, but it's not the first computer in general. Zotac released a mini PC wit
2.
by StrLght 16d ago
If you expect a story about how this migration to native went from technical PoV, they've already shared this: https://shopify.engineering/shop-app-migration It sounds pretty solid, so I wouldn't expect anything t
3.
by StrLght 16d ago
But you probably want to do something on your phone after unlocking it anyway? It's solved by conductive gloves during winter, sure. Other use cases remain problematic.
4.
by StrLght 19d ago
> All you really need are easy to replace batteries. They are easy _enough_ to replace already. Is it as easy as 20 years ago? Surely not. It also seems reasonable that something you're going to be realistically doing once per 3-4
5.
by StrLght 22d ago
Wow, this looks amazing! I hope we can get a better suited hardware though. Larger buttons, smaller device overall. 4.7" sounds huge, almost size of a phone.
6.
by StrLght 22d ago
TV is a client. If I remember correctly, it shouldn't transmit anything (unless connected) other than probe requests during active scanning. Which could still be illegal, but I don't think anyone will realistically investigate a l
7.
by StrLght 24d ago
Are you in an elementary school right now? If not, then I fail to see how this is relevant to kids using it there.
8.
by StrLght 26d ago
One controversial project supporting another controversial project. Wonder how and why that happened. I am inclined to believe everyone sane will distance themselves from it. Just like GNOME did.
9.
by StrLght 26d ago
I believe it's more about money ending up in an overhyped vibecoded Bash mess maintained by a very controversial figure. And that's putting it mildly.
10.
by StrLght 26d ago
> distro It's more like a set of dotfiles, but yeah.
11.
by StrLght 27d ago
Exactly! I was also surprised by this — that's a sensible default for many people. However, I agree that it should be opt-in. Docs should be more explicit about that too, they should warn users about risks of going with that option. Th
12.
by StrLght 29d ago
> How about this: don't buy a product that you don't want. How about laptop manufacturers stop making shady deals with Microsoft to force its OS on everyone? It’s crazy how many passes these companies get. A huge number of th
13.
by StrLght 1mo ago
As with all things about security — it depends on your threat model. It reduces security of the app itself, but doesn't affect security of the phone by much.
14.
by StrLght 1mo ago
eBay has been enforcing Play Integrity for over a year now. Luckily you don't lose much by using it in a browser. I also get why they'd be desperate to fight bots. It's a weak excuse for not doing it better, but at least it m
15.
by StrLght 1mo ago
There are valid RASP techniques that involve dynamic code loading, so it actually makes a lot of sense. Source: I worked on RASP a long time ago :) IMO headline is very misleading, and OP should have tried disabling all exploit protection o
16.
by StrLght 1mo ago
Still works for me. I had to update exploit protection after their latest update — I think it was enabling dynamic code loading via both memory and storage that did the trick. Edit: checked now, I have also disabled secure app spawning.
17.
by StrLght 1mo ago
It’s even less sensible when you consider the effect that small businesses have on this. But I guess it’s just another heavily lobbied law, sponsored by companies responsible for 80-90% of packaging.
18.
by StrLght 1mo ago
Would be nice to see some independent numbers and benchmarks. Apparently, Xiaomi announced this SoC today, so there's no 3rd party data about it.
19.
by StrLght 1mo ago
Well, sounds like you have a rather weird definition of accountability. You do you.
20.
by StrLght 1mo ago
This doesn't excuse a message that literally reads like call to action.
21.
by StrLght 1mo ago
AOSP is Linux. If by "mainstream" Linux you mean something like postmarketOS, I'd suggest you look up reviews or give it a try yourself. A few months ago, people were reporting a hard time placing a call, taking a photo, etc.
22.
by StrLght 1mo ago
Because it doesn't spam you with dickovers suggesting you log in when you open the link. But you're not really interested in this, are you?
23.
by StrLght 2mo ago
(2018)
24.
by StrLght 2mo ago
Could you elaborate? Who pays for what exactly? I am kinda triggered by that comment because you make it look like it's easy or inexpensive. It's not. I also came to Germany with just a suitcase and a backpack. I paid for my ticke
25.
by StrLght 2mo ago
> I personally believe that the easiest thign to attack is advertising to minors. Well then, let's regulate this instead? Advertising companies already make a pretty good guess about a person's age. It doesn't require 3r
26.
by StrLght 3mo ago
I find it to be pretty reasonable, and also consistent with what GrapheneOS previously said. They were consistently against company-owned verification. I don't see anything offensive here: they aren't attacking individuals or proj
27.
by StrLght 3mo ago
Could you please share some examples? I often see them being on point and highlighting important details. Majority of custom roms aren't taking security seriously, so I don't think there's anything wrong with calling them out
28.
by StrLght 3mo ago
This is a false dichotomy. There's way more options on this spectrum than 2 extremes.
29.
by StrLght 3mo ago
> But the problem still exists, and the issue is still on the agenda. It's still a priority to solve. People are pushing back on this every single time. Maybe it's time legislators read the room instead? Is there a step for t
30.
by StrLght 3mo ago
Last time I tried JLCPCB, it was way too expensive on a smaller scale. Simple PCB with a cheap Nordic nRF, a few other basic components, 10cm x 5cm: ~17 euros/unit (including shipping) at 5 units which was the minimum amount to order.

More ›