StopDisinfo910

44 ms·

811.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
> My comment does not apply to the small business board game company the original op thread link was about. My comment is only a direct reply to what this other comment is saying The other comment is directly targeting companies which ar
812.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
I think you are deeply disconnected from manufacturing if you think most of the companies in the value chain have CEO making millions. Most of the intermediaries are SME. Despite what you might believe from the media, SMEs are the heart of
813.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
All of this is highly debatable obviously and I’m not an oracle but find after my replies to your point. > He led and won the EU elections by a wide margin. Can’t be compared to the presidential. EU elections turnout is always extremely
814.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
Just so it’s clear, jury trials in France are limited to criminal cases. The trial considered here is a civil law one. No jury was involved.
815.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
> If hers is justified, how is the lack of Chirac's justified? That he was not seeking to be elected? As stated in another reply, being sentenced to ineligibility for embezzlement is only possible since 2017. It simply wasn’t a poss
816.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
Yes, all of this is fairly well known in France and was commented ad nauseam during the past elections. No conspiracy here. You can look at the Wikipedia article references which link to a lot of different French newspapers with large reade
817.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
> Jordan Bardella is going to take her place and most likely win in 2027. He is well liked by people, he is young and he doesn't have a political legacy. Considering Bardella past debating performance, this seems highly unlikely to
818.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
> the decision was controversial because it was too "nice" with the former minister. The decision was controversial because the elements presented as proof were weak. Let’s not rewrite history and remember that Lagarde was guil
819.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
Lagarde allowed a different between Mr Tapis and the state to go to arbitration where a panel of three judges awarded the several millions - not her. This choice was found to be negligent by the CJR, a court composed mostly of politicians,
820.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
Unsurprising. The laws making ineligibility a sanction for embezzlement, “Lois pour la confiance dans la vie politique”, is from 2017. Note also that the 2011 verdict was somewhat unusual because before 2010 when this was judged unconstitut
821.
by StopDisinfo910 2y ago
> The Prime Minister’s party was also investigated, got off with a simple fine Untrue. Seven people were condemned to jail time and made ineligible in the MoDem trial.