> If hers is justified, how is the lack of Chirac's justified? That he was not seeking to be elected? As stated in another reply, being sentenced to ineligibil

> If hers is justified, how is the lack of Chirac's justified? That he was not seeking to be elected? As stated in another reply, being sentenced to ineligibility for embezzlement is only possible since 2017. It simply wasn’t a possible sentence in 2011. Note that this is not because it was considered too harsh. Ineligibility was systematic before 2010 as anyone condemned for embezzlement was automatically removed from voting lists for five years. However this was judged unconstitutional in 2010 (because it was automatic and sentences have to be individualised, ineligibility in itself is fully constitutional).