SteveHawk27

3 ms·

1.
Restoring ReBoot from the Original Master D1 Tapes [video](youtube.com)
2 points by SteveHawk27 7mo ago|0 comments
2.
Paged Out Issue #8 [pdf](pagedout.institute)
436 points by SteveHawk27 8mo ago|74 comments
3.
Introducing Apprise-Go(unraid.net)
3 points by SteveHawk27 8mo ago|0 comments
4.
Hypergrowth Isn't Always Easy(tailscale.com)
2 points by SteveHawk27 9mo ago|0 comments
5.
Minecraft removing obfuscation in Java Edition(minecraft.net)
1027 points by SteveHawk27 1y ago|464 comments
6.
A New Chapter for Purelymail(news.purelymail.com)
5 points by SteveHawk27 2y ago|0 comments
7.
Fish 4(github.com)
312 points by SteveHawk27 2y ago|106 comments
8.
3Blue1Brown – This open problem taught me what topology is [video](youtube.com)
5 points by SteveHawk27 2y ago|0 comments
9.
Mol* – A Comprehensive Macromolecular Library(molstar.org)
5 points by SteveHawk27 5y ago|1 comments
10.
by SteveHawk27 6y ago
That comment translates to: "charm value, -1 means invalid, 0 means not recognized, it ranges from 1-100 when detecting, higher the score means more charming."
11.
by SteveHawk27 7y ago
Yeah. It's not that bad outside Wuhan, people who infected will get top level treatment, there will be best experts doing the diagnostics. But for Wuhan, where medical resources are extremely in short, we can only pray for the people t
12.
by SteveHawk27 7y ago
Quite so. The data I got is that among the people who really got the virus, positive rate of the test is only 30% - 50%. So false negative rate is as high as 50-70%. The news report (in Chinese): http://www.caixin.com/2020-0
13.
by SteveHawk27 7y ago
The main reason now is that the confirmation method of infection is still under debate and improvement. The current method is nucleic acid detection, which only has about 50% accuracy, so obviously a huge number of people out there cannot b