Sparkyte

10 ms·

151.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
After playing with and using AI for almost two years now it is not getting better from both a cost perspective and performance. So the higher the cost the better the performance. While models and hardware can be improved the curve is still
152.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Network hop isn't needed if you're deploying your microservices correctly. So you can make pod groups inside of kubernetes and application that depends on another can call that lightweight container contained in that pod group. Po
153.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
I know microservices and monoliths are a heated topic. However breaking up complicated code to preserve user experience is sometimes essential. However you can have machines that contain many services and that interact with each for perform
154.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Sounds like a process problem. 2024 development cycles should be able to handle multiple lanes of development and deployments. Also why things moved to microservices so you can deploy with minimal impact as long as you don't tightly co
155.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Kinda expensive though.
156.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Fund utility is good in addition as well. Plenty of well funded schools fail. Sometimes it is what those funds are being used for that actually drive down education.
157.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
This is where the Goverment should practice what it teaches. I understand that this data is interesting but it is utterly useless. Useless because race isn't as important as the geographical location and economic situation. Race is wha
158.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
You don't need TSA precheck at PDX because the airport is sooooooooooooo fast.
159.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
It is a little different, so you get to see the machine work. It actually does a 3D rendering of all the contents in the bag and the person running the scan can pull out the items without even opening the bag. It is wildly crazy futuristic
160.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
It's a lot like Frieza or a battle with Gandondorf. We got more phases before it shows it's real form.
161.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
I believe the other improvement people don't pay attention to is the new TSA scanners you don't have to take your laptop out.
162.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
It isn't, but it should be illegal to repair or modify something you do not own without the consent of the owner. You wouldn't rent an apartment only to put 10k renovations into it? I mean lets be real that is practically illegal.
163.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Nope it doesn't that is 12 channels 2 modules per channel each module at 2GB is the largest the chip gets and the cost of those drastically increase the cost. The problem you experience with GDDR6 and channels is width. You get higher
164.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
In terms of efficiency having mixed cores would be excellent. You can rely on ARM for lightweight system operations and where advanced instructions come to play like AVX-512 use x86-64. The problem as it was told to me was that you run into
165.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Because you can't stack that much ram on a GPU without sufficient channels to do so. You could probably do 64GB on GDDR6 but you can't do 128GB on GDDR6 without more memory channels. 2GB per chip per channel is the current limit f
166.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Intel over there with two spears in the knees looking puzzled and in pain.
167.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Yep and most of these large industry leaders are dying not because of the engineers but the quality of the management orchestrating the success and failures of the engineers rather than letting them work their magic.
168.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
True, but if they matured this wouldn't be an issue. I think Intel should be acquired by the government fixed up and remanaged. Then sold off again or given the opportunity to buy itself back. If a government gives out money year after
169.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
I would love IBM Power to return.
170.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
My belief on this is that if a business received grants before the Government itself should take acquisition of the company almost like PBS thing and get it back to a functional state. The Government can later sell it off. I think grants do
171.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
I would prefer some other competitor enters the market. Oh wait Intel killed them before they could be rivals like AMD. - VIA - IBM - Cyrix I mean IBM is around but I doubt they'll touch x86 ever again.
172.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
do not disagree with* late night typing and auto correct...
173.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
That I do now disagree with. It is a portal to something and data.
174.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Right, but the problem with most arguments supporting the break up of Chrome from Google are really not looking at the bigger picture. YouTube is more of a monopolistic threat than Chrome will ever be. If it was sold off it would mean most
175.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
You can walk into the store and see the store across the street. Chrome is akin to a loss leader like hotdogs CostCo. The problem isn't the Browser it is the other services it has that makes it a monopoly. Don't let, "Oh we s
176.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
This is too complicated Chrome couldn't survive on its own without Google. Chrome is fundamentally a way for users to interface with their products. However it would be better to give regulation to Goolge about information handling.
177.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Chrome is like a service not a product it is effectively Google installing a window so you can see it's fresh baked goods. It isn't something they should break up because it isn't something that inherently makes money and nor
178.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
AI is a tool and nothing more. You give it too much and it will fumble, humans fumble but we can self correct where instead AI hallucinates. Crazy nightmare AI dreams.
179.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Lets be real though most people can't beat a grandmaster. It is impressive to see it last more rounds as it progressed.
180.
by Sparkyte 2y ago
Sometimes I feel like someone already wrote what I am writing and it doesn't feel good to just work on something I know could be critiqued hard because an alternative exists.

More ›