SoupyDolphin

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   Good points. I think the value of each offering greatly depends on whether you already have a Steam (or similar) library of games.
2. 2.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   No the games stream from Nvidia's servers, no LAN and no computer needed.
3. 3.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   Exactly. I moved coasts and sold my gaming PC, bought a Shield in the meantime, and haven't felt the need to shell out for another PC build because the Shield does it all for me.
4. 4.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   These days I'm mostly a couch/casual gamer, and I don't play latency critical games so much anymore. That being said, I've played many PVP matches on Destiny 2 and the experience has been fine. I'll try some more la
5. 5.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   This. You don't need a PC at all, I don't have one, just a TV and a Shield, and GeForce Now works great for me. I just buy Steam games through their website and it works perfectly.
6. 6.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 7y ago

   Discussions around Stadia always fail to mention the alternatives. I've been using GeForce Now with a Nvidia Shield for over a year now and it's been a great experience. The hardware costs are the same as the Stadia ($130), it&#x2
7. 7.▲
   by SoupyDolphin 8y ago

   Services like this are already in operation, see Shadow and GeForce Now. Developers don't need to do anything to have their games supported on these platforms either, so I don't understand what Google are bringing to the table wit