Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Solstinox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
Morrison Shelters
(vintag.es)
2 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
0 comments
92.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Tim Cook was a masterful operations guy with an MBA™ in the early 2000s. Rather than compete for manufacturing with the big, established, and expensive manufacturers in places like Japan, he partnered with little nobody Chinese manufacturer
93.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Huge, complicated companies like Apple don't see the world as you or I do. They see the world through whatever sensors they're equipped with, and they respond to what those sensors are fed by other parts of the company. They are f
94.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Rule #1 of All Coding: Keep it simple. If it's not simple, simplify it. Once you've got that rule down, pick a popular language (Python's good because you can ask questions and get answers), pick a simple program that'd
95.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
A quick, cheap, non-invasive test that is less accurate (in the direction of more false positives) would be far more effective than a more accurate but slow, expensive, and intrusive test.
96.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
I guess Microsoft may drop ~$30 billion on this poisoned chalice out of goodwill.
97.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
If you have a big enough starting pool of people engaged in a mostly chance-based activity and they all have low odds for success, after a few iterations you still end up with a hefty number of people who look like they've got it all
98.
▲
Requisite Variety
(blogs.wright.edu)
2 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
0 comments
99.
▲
What you lose when you retool
(methodicallyprocessing.com)
5 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
0 comments
100.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Neat! With real writing it’s nice to be able to use the random variations and patterns in writing as landmarks. I always thought that would be useful on a screen.
101.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
I didn’t know that either, thank you! It works with triple-click paragraphs too.
102.
▲
Ask HN: Why does copy and paste sometimes just not work?
1 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
4 comments
103.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Double click text to select a word. Triple click text to select the whole paragraph. For decades I assumed that there’s some weird fluky behavior when trying to select a word and accidentally selecting the paragraph.
104.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
I’ve not dabbled with Google’s music offerings because they don’t seem like a musical company in the way that Spotify/Apple are. Terrible reason, I know.
105.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
You’re wedged in quite a spot with this. You’re like a think-tank, but not. Companies can easily partner with some university to get their students to do this sort of thing for close to free, but many don’t. So you’re basically consultants,
106.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Is it true that we (not HN, but US as a geopolitical entity) have ever believed in a global internet? Seems naive. We’ve believed in the American internet purveyed by America to the world. Countries like China deployed their firewalls preci
107.
▲
The Rule of 72
(betterexplained.com)
2 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
It’s fun to do this across a variety of basic states. Drunk vs. Sober Tired vs. Awake Hungry vs. Satiated Amazing how dramatically each changes your perspective.
109.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
You know what’s worse than having to work with JIRA/Confluence/Bit Bucket, and such? Working with people who keep changing systems every 6-12 months. A crappy system used fully is better than system surfing to find the Holy Grail™
110.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
You mean double-edge, right? I thought straight edge was basically a shaving knife you can sharpen...
111.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Equity is an interesting goal because it’s ephemeral. The pattern of history is: ...insane inequity, a brief moment of equity gained through violence, a long march back to insane inequity, insane inequity, a brief moment equity gained throu
112.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
...and get better sleep.
113.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
The default 80/20 example everyone uses for Pareto misleads you about the nature of the insight. You can observe any combo, and they need not add up to 100%. It could just as well be “12% of the effort gets you 100% of your results, an
114.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Apple/Schiller are good, maybe even the best. That doesn't mean they anticipated, planned, or engineered individual conversations between two people.
115.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
The nature of lofty awards, fellowships, and titles is political, social, and if the former allow, merit-based.
116.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Wouldn't give Phil or Apple marketing that much credit. They're good, they're not that good.
117.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
Guess Scott Forstall did not make extraordinary technical OR leadership contributions to personal computing while at the company. Bummer.
118.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
One of the ugliest and more difficult to grasp charts Apple has put together in a long time. Desktops vs. notebooks vs. a sickly light shining on bathroom tiles in the background.
119.
▲
Roman emperors visualized with neural nets, Photoshop, and historical references
(medium.com)
7 points
by
Solstinox
6y ago
|
0 comments
120.
▲
by
Solstinox
6y ago
The kind of people who make and buy these technologies say, “you just need more data/a better algorithm.” They don’t get that you could have 99.99999% of all possible information on a person AND that the missing 0.00001% could change
More ›