Soeldner123

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Soeldner123 9y ago

   > Ah, the brand new account created just to push against an antisexist position suddenly has well-developed opinions on the history and the purpose of this website. What a surprise! I copy and pasted the intent from the welcome tab. &quo
2. 2.▲
   by Soeldner123 9y ago

   >I don't have to define anything. I don't have to rebut anything. Certainly not. The request for a definition was meant to imply I can’t talk to the claim about “social accountability,” not knowing your definition. Unfortunat
3. 3.▲
   by Soeldner123 9y ago

   > Yes, it matters whether you are owning your words. Well, clearly, superficial things to the actual content of the discussion like who I am, matters to you. A blanket statement that "it matters," is too reductive. > This d
4. 4.▲
   by Soeldner123 9y ago

   >No. It is the same discussion, just revised for fancier modern science. You seem to be missing the nuance of distribution vs every individual. To me, this is a big distinction. >"I, a man, have noticed a possible fact about wom
5. 5.▲
   by Soeldner123 9y ago

   > It is only hard to believe if you are entirely unfamiliar with the history of this discussion. Completely disagree. The crux of most historical discussions were based on ability and was blanketed to all individual women, as they were