SnowFace

7 ms·

1.
by SnowFace 10y ago
Seems my point flew over your head again. You keep calling things irrelevant that you don't like. I'm done.
2.
by SnowFace 10y ago
When did Hillary come out against the war?
3.
by SnowFace 10y ago
This is actually a great example of how modern day propaganda works. One tactic to discredit someone is to combine two true statements by them that look similar to create a false statement. Case in point: Claim 1: Trump says he was against
4.
by SnowFace 10y ago
> Being against the war after it started is utterly irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant when someone claims "I was totally against the war in Iraq” is a lie. That's provably true. > He was weakly in support of the war before it
5.
by SnowFace 10y ago
You're trying to put his statement into a different context now. I thought we were talking about him saying that he was totally against the war in Iraq, which he was. So we agree that wasn't a lie. > "[H]ad I been in Congr
6.
by SnowFace 10y ago
"Look at the war in Iraq and the mess that we’re in. I would never have handled it that way. Does anybody really believe that Iraq is going to be a wonderful democracy where people are going to run down to the voting box and gently put
7.
by SnowFace 10y ago
Shame on you. You don't like his politics, fine, but cut the propaganda. > Lying about his past support for the Iraq war Go watch his Howard Stern interview yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OU_Vrb_QXo . Lis
8.
by SnowFace 10y ago
1. Trump defended is statements in follow-ups. It's not post-facto reasoning. The media jumped immediately to racism though, just like the other day when they claimed Trump lied about a supposed Sweden terrorist attack, when he was tal
9.
by SnowFace 10y ago
The San Diego La Raza Lawyer's Association, the group the judge belonged to, gave scholarships to illegal immigrants. You're nit-picking to detract from my point, that the judge had a reasonable chance of bias, and Trump was right
10.
by SnowFace 10y ago
I don't know if it's a conspiracy or not, but it's happened before. Castro sent criminals and mentally-ill to the US. Mexico is also our biggest supplier of drugs, and 80% of the women who cross the border are raped. Of cours
11.
by SnowFace 10y ago
It should be easy to quote it then. What exactly was extremely abhorrent?
12.
by SnowFace 10y ago
The nit-picks are irrelevant. La Raza has a record of supporting illegal immigrants. Trump wants to build a wall. My broader point that the judge had a reasonable chance of bias stands, and Trump was right to point this out. > They didn&
13.
by SnowFace 10y ago
Not really. It's 100% standard to dismiss a judge for having a bias. You can't look at her being Mexican in isolation. When you consider how the media spun his statements on Mexicans, how the judge is a member of La Rasa, and how
14.
by SnowFace 10y ago
> His entire spiel about Mexicans being drug dealers and rapists. His entire spiel was spun up by the media. If you go back to what he actually said, in context, it's hard to find anything wrong. Show me an example.
15.
by SnowFace 10y ago
He settled the case, not lost. He also was never accused of discrimination himself, by anybody. Others were. He was the new President of his father's business in an era of witchhunts, and he got dragged into it, but if you look at his
16.
by SnowFace 10y ago
> "A well-educated black has a tremendous advantage" How is that racist? Isn't that the point of affirmative action? > "Black guys counting my money! I hate it" Says a guy that Trump fired. I'm skeptical,
17.
by SnowFace 10y ago
Show me where Trump is racist. Show me just one example.
18.
by SnowFace 10y ago
You've been reading fake news. He never said Mexicans were rapists. He said some illegal Mexicans were rapists. Which is provably true. It's not opinion. Its also true that 80% of women crossing the border get raped, so someth