Smurfix

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Smurfix 2y ago

   They knew that the target had nearly half a million [child ab]users. That's sufficient motivation right there. The problem is that once you have the infrastructure you can go after, well, any other random Tor onion service you damn wel
2. 2.▲
   by Smurfix 4y ago

   Well, Ok, so the main thing that's good about it is that it's dead easy to start a goroutine. But that's actually bad, just like randomly jumping to any piece of code whatsoever is bad in in a procedural language. Read the St
3. 3.▲
   by Smurfix 4y ago

   How the heck should a library author know whether an error is recoverable or not? In many situations that depends entirely on the caller. Not-so-contrived example: a config options contains a value that leads to a division by zero in some l
4. 4.▲
   by Smurfix 9y ago

   You mean, like systemd?
5. 5.▲
   by Smurfix 9y ago

   Of course the tests are tested – by the code they're covering, which is also covered by other tests.
6. 6.▲
   by Smurfix 9y ago

   People can get by with zero LIDARs. There's no reason why autonomous cars couldn't. The real problems are elsewhere (emergency vehicles, ambiguous situations, construction, …). We'll need operators on standby for a looong tim
7. 7.▲
   by Smurfix 10y ago

   Dudette, actually. Pay attention. :-P
8. 8.▲
   by Smurfix 10y ago

   People still don' (want to) understand software.