Smokey28

6 ms·

1.
by Smokey28 7y ago
>In conclusion, your entire comment is a collection of the very worst, lazy and dishonest arguments and excuses for advertising. And yet you couldn't address any of them without dodging the material part of the argument in favor of
2.
by Smokey28 7y ago
I just flat out disagree with most of the premises you have shared here. Also I don't understand how something can be wrong or right in an 'academic sense' but fine: >They distort the product market as they favour those pl
3.
by Smokey28 7y ago
This just isn't true though. Or at least I don't see where you're coming from. You might see ads as intrusive, or getting you to spend money on something you don't want to spend money on... but that's not how many a
4.
by Smokey28 8y ago
Exactly this. I've spent the last year or so studying Ford. His whole point was that if people didn't have the money to buy his product or time to use it (he reduced work hours as well) then your business will never survive. He wa
5.
by Smokey28 12y ago
There is a lot of good information here. The only thing I'll add, which is present in bits and pieces is - hustle. Hustle your behind off. I have a friend rightly stated the difference between a freelancer and a full time employee is
6.
by Smokey28 12y ago
Sure thing. Your assumption that "it was smashed in the first place" is based on a news report, my assumption being that you are not a Gaza power station employee. In a case where something was fixed nearly a year ahead of the rep
7.
by Smokey28 12y ago
Which is now up and running a shocking 46 weeks ahead of schedule. Don't believe everything you read.