SlickNixon

8 ms·

31.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Why I always make a point to mention my preferred methods for determining architecture--bird signs, and throwing the bones.
32.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>The profitable small farm is common enough, particular among the older generations who have their debts paid off The purchase of said farms and the paying off of said debts wouldn't happen to be enabled by a long career in tech by
33.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
And is it your impression that I agree that the argument in the summary you provided is more or less accurate, and the material on the laptop as reported is evidence of foul play and cause for further investigation?
34.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
I thought we were assuming everything was on the level on the basis of Autumn Sorrells' credentials?
35.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>Well I dont know what else to say to someone who thinks they are informed, when they aren't and who refuses to look elsewhere. Did you read my comments before you showed up and started shooting holes in the floor? Specifically: &gt
36.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>It sounds to me like you are just providing a rationalisation for a closed mind. Oh no I'm accused of being anti-intellectual. Wait, see: >put the recommendee on the back foot where they're refusing to read a source as offe
37.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
The world is filled with falsehoods that were instantly and uncritically taken as truths by susceptible segments of the population. Photos are admittedly different (text is slippery when it comes to true or false; there's a binary qual
38.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Would the contents of the Amazon delivery van end up in the Boston Harbor or on ebay?
39.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Why would I need to search for her credentials when you gave me a url to her LinkedIn profile? Are you familiar with the complaint lodged against Neuralink by PCRM? Did you read the Guardian and Business Wire articles that iancmceachern pos
40.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
When it suits them. See: https://www.newsweek.com/world-cup-worker-threatened-100-las...
41.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
I appreciate the input, but I'm going to do a heel-face (face-heel?) turn and say that I trust that book about as far as I can throw it. There's an entire industry dedicated to rapidly churning out books on right-wing culture war
42.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Hold on, pump the brakes. How do you know what is or isn't on the laptop?
43.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
If you're taking adds: https://www.protolabs.com/ https://www.xometry.com/
44.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>That's not at all what I've done. It was an uncharitable characterization, my apologies. >The mere existence of an inbound solicitation is not evidence of corruption. This is true. The counterpoint is that there's a lo
45.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
I think the main source of confusion is here is that the original author said "weapons", which about half of commentators have taken to mean weapons/warheads and half have taken to mean nuclear material of any variety.
46.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>Feynman had discovered that the Y-12 Plant was storing uranium nitrate solution enriched in U-235 in drums holding 300 to 3,000 gallons. After performing some calculations, the young physicist determined that the drums were placed in po
47.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>the "big guy" referenced... Remarkable to see the "it wasn't him, and if it was... and if he did, he didn't... and if it is..." play out in earnest.
48.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Fission, boosted, or fusion all start with a fission bomb with a possibility to fizzle.
49.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>even if we take Vance out of the picture Pump the brakes. With Vance out of the picture your initial comment is a link to someone's LinkedIn profile. Do you want answers to these questions or are you throwing up flak?
50.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
All of those examples involve reactors, single cores, or fluid containers.
51.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
I believe the original question was whether storage of multiple weapons in the same vicinity could result in accidental assembly of a critical mass, which appears to be something the author of the original blog came up with on their own.
52.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
We are in agreement on the crypto split between illicit and mainstream activities, and your points are well supported by the history of monero/XMR--it can't be bought with card or bank transfer on any of the major exchanges, and h
53.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
I understand your point more fully now, and agree that my second reply was somewhat orthogonal to it. Crypto is a huge risk minimizer for buying illicit goods. Unless you make the punishment for purchasing cryptocurrencies severe (on par wi
54.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
A buyer's intentions after the purchase of an illicit item have zero relevance to the evasion of law enforcement during the purchase itself.
55.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Perhaps a third incentive program... I'm just joshing around. You make good points, and I appreciate your sincerity. >we get these 7-layer wedding cake Rube Goldberg machines because we want to show how ideologically pure we are in
56.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Enact a secondary system that rewards the discovery and elimination of illicit rodent breeding programs.
57.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Your initial (implicit) claim was that Ashlee Vance is an unbiased observer, which has yet to be substantiated. How can we know that Vance is self-censoring? We can't. I'm sure they believe everything they're saying, but if t
58.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
Wait until you find out what people buy with cryptocurrency.
59.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't b
60.
by SlickNixon 4y ago
>You equate pointing out the existence of a genocide with a "call to violent action" I take it you favor a more passive approach. >Your comment, in the context of this conversation, argues in favour of arresting anyone who p

More ›