Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SkyBelow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
241.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>nothing to do with So what is the meaning of to do with and nothing to do with? Inspiration seems to be a relationship. Consider a different relationship between cellular biology and the Cells at Work anime. Clearly any relationship i
242.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Now I'm left wondering how well this would work substituting in different books. Different religious texts? Especially if you pick one that is not part of the primary religion of the area you are located in. A Modest Proposal? Probab
243.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Is there really a need for an abbreviation that cuts off 3 characters of an 8 character word? Feels like the risk of getting it mixed up with mRNA outweighs in. Then again, that mixup might happen even if microRNA wasn't abbreviated.
244.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Not just the mindset. Our social setting can deem some hypothesis must be true and any disagreement is blasphemy of the highest order. The 'softer' a science, the more beliefs like this that exist. Sometimes you can even see sc
245.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
It is also key to building the idea that we don't have truth, we have the best model we have so far not found reason to reject (and sometimes one that is rejected as truth, but useful for some problems to be kept around). I see too ma
246.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>There's actually quite a big assumption in here -- namely, that the truth is constant over time and throughout space. The current models include these assumptions for the same reason they include any other assumptions, because mode
247.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>time t can extend indefinitely Isn't that generally what convergence means? At least in the math sense, we are talking about t at infinity, meaning that in any real world time limited application, there is always a gap.
248.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Is there an issue with how the data is grouped? At 19.9, you have a 50% chance of living to 59.9. But less than a season later at 20.1, you now only have a 50% chance o living to 40.1. How can the former be right if the latter is right?
249.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>that laws and theories are presented as just something that you need to memorize That's part of a larger problem in how science is presented. It is presented as something that is true, when it isn't. It is a model that descr
250.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Better programming, task to task, does not result in better applications. For a simple example, consider a would be program that takes 100 tasks of 16 hours each to build a program with a quality of 75%. With AI, those tasks can take an av
251.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
I think most things exist on a spectrum, though it is better modeled by a much higher order feature space and the spectrums we talk about day to day are stereotypes made to easily explain this, because a 1d scale going from 'no x at al
252.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
How does it work if we apply this logic to other groups who have been treated in such a way that historically led to worse average life outcomes, but which have recently had improvement due to society becoming more accepting of them? When
253.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Being willing to work 40.5 hours fulfills this addendum. It doesn't mean anything more than that, nor does it apply to if you are still okay sometime in the future.
254.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>Replace "youtube videos" with whatever the company is trying to achieve. I see it all the time in large organizations, where different teams forget what the goal of the company is and instead get hyperfocused on their teams KP
255.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
The issue is that many small scale price discriminations on individually reasonable criteria might present itself as a large scale discrimination of the type that lawmakers and others do care about. The way terms are overloaded does no fav
256.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
I could see an AI trying to hunt out a person's bottom line. I could offer this job for $10 to everyone, but maybe I'll subtract 0 to 4 dollars when I offer it and see who does or doesn't bite. If someone bites on lower pay
257.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>We quickly skipped the "early tinkering" phase of AI Was it skipped, or was it spread over many decades with AI winters interspersed throughout?
258.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Your brain is constantly sensing things that you don't perceive because it is quickly filtered out. My guess is that tinnitus, at least at low levels, works much the same. So the more you think about it, the more you focus on perceiv
259.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
"Security at the expense of usability, comes at the expense of security." strikes once again (if you squint and see usability to include following the path of least resistance, which I think counts). Good security is expensive. B
260.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>Kahle portrays the court cases and legal judgements as a crusade against the Internet Archive and all librarians (see https://blog.archive.org/2023/12/15/brewster-kahle-appeal-st ...). It's not. I
261.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
There seems to be a simpler fix though, that avoids the major negative effects of the larger changes. They take out loans and aren't taxed on it. But they have to pay taxes when they pay off the loans, and at that time they'll ow
262.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
You can see this by giving it broken code and seeing what it can predict. I gave copilot a number of implementations of factorial with the input of 5. When it recognized the correct implementations, it was able to combine the ideas of &quo
263.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>get a sticker for your car In some cases, larger donations get you different stickers showing your level of 'support'.
264.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
One of the things worse than a bad law is an inconsistently applied bad law, as that allows for it to be tolerated for longer and effectively enshrines the basis for the inconsistency as the true law of the land.
265.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Is that really the case? Judges shut down some loopholes or 'hacks', but then others are allowed as being perfectly acceptable. The rational that decides when one is allowed and one is not seems to be a second level to the hacki
266.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Contract law as a whole has a major flaw where the vast majority of consumers are entering into contracts they cannot provide informed consent to. To call these consensual contracts is to reduce consent to a saying yes even if one does not
267.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>but it does mean we should refrain from assuming it must be true A good scientist will tell you that we don't assume it is truth. Instead, it is the closest thing to truth we can get at this time, but we are always seek better. B
268.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
>but it’s not necessarily reasonable to spend decades building layers and layers of models that assume X at the most basic level. If the only option for finding out better evidence for or against X is by building those models and watchin
269.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
My guess is that scientists are considering this, but until now no better theory has been presented. Part of this is the distinction between what is happening and why the model says is happening. Does any physicist believe they have the pe
270.
▲
by
SkyBelow
2y ago
Or ever more local differences like when school age cut off is. I would expect some small differences be found due to these impacts, but they would not be universally applicable without generalization. If schools roll over to the next grad
More ›