SkyBelow

14 ms·

151.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
The issue is that there are some online activities which we all agree that children must be banned from no matter the cost to do so. Society has now started shifting in what actually falls in that group, but no one is arguing against the g
152.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
>These are kids younger than 13, they don't have jobs, they live with their parents, no internet/data planes outside of control of their parents, no nothing. Yes they do. If all that is preventing them from having a job is dep
153.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
>everyone has a face Does everyone who is 18+ have a face that passes for 18+ (and the inverse as well)? Overall it seems like a bad idea, but one demanded by what sounds like a good idea with not reasonable way to fully implement it, le
154.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
>Parents are responsible for their children. If this is the case, why do we pass any special child protection laws that override what a parent decides is best for their child (and in a way that punishes those involved beyond just the par
155.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
This is only a counter if the standards to get those levels of attainment have stayed the same (or increased). The previous claim includes a claim of the standards dropping, meaning that the people who obtain them can increase even as the
156.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
Often it is a second order impact. This creates a bunch of work for the compliance people, but then the compliance people end up competing a bunch of work for everyone else. If you count anyone who might have to follow compliance as worki
157.
by SkyBelow 1y ago
Politics are also never discussed with any level of depth. At best, it each side throwing in their opening arguments and nothing more. More often you don't even get that and instead have attacking people directly, stereotyping, straw
158.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Even if we completely toss out IP, isn't an artist free to release whatever version of their content they want? I find that AI poisoning seems to be a speed bump at best, but I don't see an issue with artists using it if they wis
159.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>As someone already said, parents used to be concerned that kids wouldn't be able to solve maths problems without a calculator Were they wrong? People who rely too much on a calculator don't develop strong math muscles that ca
160.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
What do you think they might be looking for that could be detected pretty quickly? I'm wondering if it is something like they can track mouse movement and calculate when a mouse is moving too cleanly, so adding some more human like no
161.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
In particular, the task requires understanding that one can impact the world through action. This is learned by humans through a constant feedback loop running for months to a year+. The very way we train AIs doesn't seem to teach th
162.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
The challenge is that sufficiently bad code could be intentional or it could be from a lack of skill. For example, I've seen a C# application where every function takes in and outputs an array of objects, supposedly built that way so t
163.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
I'm against calculators in schools due to their detriment on learning. What's my age?
164.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Compared to the population at large, how does their definition do? Compared to philosophers and neuroscientists, it is lacking, no doubt. But that's the top 1% of the population in being able to define intelligence. So where does th
165.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
It was, but I wonder to what extent it is based on the idea that a chain of thought in humans shows how we actually think. If you have chain of thought in your head, can you use it to modify what you are seeing, have it operate twice at on
166.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Don't we? Particle physics provides such a model. There is a bit of difficulty in scaling the calculations, but it is sort of like the basic back propagation in a neural network. How <insert modern AI functionality> arises fro
167.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
One problem is that we have been basing too much on [human brain] for so long that we ended up with some ethical problems as we decided other brains didn't count as intelligent. As such, science has taken an approach of not assuming h
168.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
It is about when they are or aren't in the light cones. If we remove relativity for a moment and define some time T=0, then Alice and Bob do see different things. The thing is that at 0, Bob and Alice aren't in each other light
169.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>It says nothing about repeaters. If someone id at the edge of your observable universe they could still send you a message. They’re observable universe would necessarily include light that wouldn’t reach you due to expansion. I don&#x27
170.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Just because something is untestable today doesn’t mean it will be for all time. This is generally true, but such ideas are kept outside the realm of science until they are. In this case specifically, all our knowledge points to this r
171.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Is it an illusory artifact or is it all that exists? If it can't be observed, it can't be tested, it can't be verified in any way or ever interacted with, then isn't it just an instances of Russell's Teapot and thu
172.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
It is often presented this way because models generally mix up the observable universe and the universe. One key notion is that we are at the center of the universe. Not the Milky Way, not the Sun, Earth is. Yet we know that Earth isn&#x
173.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Potentially, but it seems like an untestable hypothesis by itself.
174.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Claude speaks dozens of languages fluently—from English and French to Chinese and Tagalog. How does this multilingual ability work? Is there a separate "French Claude" and "Chinese Claude" running in parallel, respon
175.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
While there are numerous neural network models, the ones I recall the details of are trained to generate the next word. There is no training them to hold some more abstract 'thought' as it is running. Simpler models don't h
176.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Ignoring for a moment their training, how do they function? They do seem to output a limited selection of text at a time (be it a single token or some larger group). Maybe it is the wording of "trained to" verses "trained on
177.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
I wonder if CSV is the trivial format, so you have many people picking it because they want the easiest, and still getting it wrong. JSON is harder, so very few people are going to roll their own serializer/deserializer, and those who
178.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
We need to admit schools are babysitting kids and not teaching them anymore. A few kids can still learn, but so many others don't. Especially the one who would learn in a better environment, but whose class is disrupted by 1 or 2 stu
179.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>so some students are in some classes purely to tick a checkbox As a student I was forced to take classes I would have never willingly chosen to take, and yet I still learned from them. I worked for an A and didn't consider cheatin
180.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Grift implies an intentional value extraction without providing anything. Is it without providing anything, or a value extraction greater than what one is providing? If the former, it makes the definition very each to check, but it almo

More ›