Skrekkpus

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Skrekkpus 14y ago

   True, but Unity is even better. The same regime might still apply though.
2. 2.▲
   by Skrekkpus 14y ago

   developing anything equivalent to a half ambitious flash app in html5 is just really hard. html5 has a long way to go.
3. 3.▲
   by Skrekkpus 15y ago

   there is something better, Unity3D. It's available for free so you can start developing, but then you get locked in of course and eventually that means paying for premium features if you want your game to shine.
4. 4.▲
   by Skrekkpus 15y ago

   I completely agree they have been lazy, and gpu accelerated 3d should have been there ages ago. In the meantime Unity has popped up as a great alternative for indie devs who want to make 3d games.
5. 5.▲
   by Skrekkpus 15y ago

   There have been a few performance tests and they indicate that it is very even. WebGL still has no chance in my opinion because there are no good development tools (compare that to unity3D), also WebGL apparently has the biggest security is
6. 6.▲
   by Skrekkpus 15y ago

   You think html5 is going to compete with flash/unity on 3d gaming??? Haha, you're cute!
7. 7.▲
   by Skrekkpus 15y ago

   Although it is true there are security problems, it is silly to think that is something unique for flash. WebGl is probably the most insecure plugin right now, largely because there is no one company responsible for upgrading it. Although t