Siwi

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   http://www.dw.com/en/mark-zuckerbergs-offensive-on-hate-spee... http://www.dw.com/en/berlin-police-raid-homes-in-crackdown-o... And one on a "mainstream dissident" that's quite cont
2. 2.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   In this case, that's actually not true. It's being defined by the European Commission and imposed on these sites.
3. 3.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   This issue is less about Facebook, Twitter, etc. choosing to a code of conduct than it is about having limitations on speech imposed on them by the EC. For this reason, it's about freedom of expression and not about self driven no-pla
4. 4.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   What ever happened to the principle "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." This is about putting the lid on views of their citizens that European governments don't like. Dis
5. 5.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   This is not about no-platforming, where the private company sets the terms of conduct for its users. This is about freedom of expression being encroached upon; the government (EC) is telling companies owned privately by shareholders, and u
6. 6.▲
   by Siwi 10y ago

   American tech companies shouldn't indulge censorship, even if it seems well intentioned, the scope is promised to be limited, and the pressure from governments is immense. They also shouldn't try to pick political winners by prom