SiempreViernes

6 ms·

91.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
The quote is from the page in OP, its not necessary to circumvent the dead link to see the remark (not that finding the original article is very hard in any case).
92.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> Runners who were on pace to finish between 3:45 and 3:55 or between 4:05 and 4:15 ran approximately 6%–8% slower in the last 2.195 kilometers. In contrast, runners who were on pace to finish close to the 4-hour mark (3:55–4:02) ran onl
93.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> One of the most common comments I've seen online about this graph and/or this paper is that this is due to pace runners provided by the marathon. Section 4.4 of the paper gives multiple explanations for why this cannot be the
94.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Generally organised crime groups has some skill at avoiding being provably responsible for crimes, it's a precondition for remaining active.
95.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> The broader point is that being a couple days or months younger or older than eighteen years should not result in a drastically different outcomes to begin with. The problem is that anytime you create a division there are always some c
96.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> The article title claims causality. Maybe they edited the title since you saw it, but currently there's no claims of causation unless you think "can" and "will" are synonyms.
97.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Here's an article where a physics grad himself is calling being a quant as "the dark side", it's from last year but the expression is much older. https://www.colorado.edu/physics/2025/09/22
98.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> Culture-wise, the professors at the university were also very different than what I was used to in Germany. [...] My thesis advisor, Alicia Ageno, for instance, had a meeting with me about every two weeks and sent me relevant papers an
99.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
I know of a pensioner who successfully did up to a Masters in astronomy, so there are definitely examples of older people as students in academia (not to mention many the professors are older, and especially the emeritus professors).
100.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> but how do you deal with the fact that university, in practice, is not "for the joy of learning"? I think this strongly depends on the subject you study, most people in mechanical engineering will have a very different attitu
101.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> [Regularisation] tends to be more robust, because of the bitter lesson. This seems circular? Over-parametrisation and stochastic gradient decent provides automatic regularisation, and it turns out this regularisation is very good i
102.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Thankfully MS also has a policy of not trying very hard to prevent illicit distribution of their software, so the worst they can really do is brick your machine on patch Tuesday, which is just the standard risk you run every time anyway.
103.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Are you sure you know what AWS is?
104.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Indeed, which is why its so annoying the editor chose to put "trap" in the title!
105.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Oh no, the devs back then were for sure taking all the shortcuts they could, there just weren't as many ways to leave problems for the users compute to solve.
106.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
For anyone wondering about the title, by "trap" they mean "detect destructively": there are no stable neutrinos in a bottle in this article.
107.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
You mean Anthropic and OpenAI, right?
108.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
Anthropic was forced to pay some people they stole content from, there was no attempt at getting permission ahead of time. And paying basically everyone online is more or less a solved problem, it's what ad agencies have to do ever
109.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
BigAI are all in the bootlegging market themselves, so it's always funny to see them complaining about others copying their "product".
110.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
You can probably buy some of the older rolling stock from DB thought.
111.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
That's not particularly surprising nor objectionable, of course legislation that reminds employers they shouldn't discriminate based on race changes practice even for companies that aren't actually caught doing it. To act l
112.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
No, it is a precise reference to an accurate description of a type of disruptive behavior.
113.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
[flagged]
114.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> Using what team members would later describe with words like “magic” and “alchemy” and “bells and whistles,” Ok, these peopl have all gotten extensive training on how to hype for the non-technical crowd without saying anything of subst
115.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3xgwyywe4o
116.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
That's not why they were banned, and in any case lifting a ban on building something that nobody will build doesn't seem like good use of legislators time.
117.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
> Yet again, who is paying for this? This is a modern witch hunt. Since this can only mean the DOGE witch hunt we all clearly remember, I think Elon Musk was paying for it? But now it's just taxpayer money (if there is anything left
118.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
As a leading exporter of coal Australia isn't really a good example of a serious climate actor.
119.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
They are starting to deploy to customers now, not sure if that counts as "complete" or not. The big innovation here is that they are doing it all legally.
120.
by SiempreViernes 4mo ago
I guess if you are strict about it, making derogatory comments like yours is indeed not hate. But I'm sure you are aware that "getting hate" frequently used in a more extensive meaning online, especially in the context of rep

More ›