ShaneCurcuru

5 ms·

1.
by ShaneCurcuru 7mo ago
Open Collective (really Open Finance Consortium Inc.) is a US 501(c)(6) nonprofit that runs a payments and accounting platform, providing fund acceptance and budget services to a ton of different community collectives and funding groups,
2.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
Personally I know it since I've been volunteering there since 1999 and know how elections work and know most of the membership. But that probably doesn't help much if you don't know me. Practically, I know it because the ASF
3.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
Apparently marketing people who want to sell stuff under those new licenses think "source available" is uncool. Some folks are working on terminology over here, if you're curious. https://github.com/softwareco
4.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
SSPL is definitely not open source, it violates #6: https://opensource.org/definition-annotated#6 That's the point of open source, and free software in a way as well. Copyleft licenses have restrictions, but as long a
5.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
If you simply believe "CLAs are bad", you're missing the point (unless you refuse all legal documents on principle, or something). The question is: WHO are you signing the CLA over to? If it's a for-profit company, well,
6.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
As noted elsethread, there are several 501(c)(3)s that pay for software development, either via having their employees/contractors do it (directly or indirectly), or by providing grants or one-off funding for specific kinds of work. I
7.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
Naming things is hard, as software engineers know. It's only OCF that's shutting down, not OC, or OCE, or OSC, or even OCNZ (I just found out about that one today). In any case, there are plenty of other funding models/sites
8.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
I have a general explainer about the OCF shutdown (not the OC, or OSC, or OSE, or OSNV!) over here, where I include more links to software foundations that might also act as fiscal hosts, like Conservancy, SPI, or NumFocus. https:/&#x
9.
by ShaneCurcuru 3y ago
The OCF shutdown will not affect the OC, OSC, OCE, OCNZ, or Social Change Nest UK operations, so this is only about the 600 collectives at the US public charity OCF. If those acronyms sound confusing, read my explainer: https://c
10.
by ShaneCurcuru 7y ago
Important clarifications: - The announcement is only about technology, there's no "partnership" between the ASF and GitHub. The ASF is vendor-neutral about all of it's operations. In particular, there is an expectation
11.
by ShaneCurcuru 8y ago
Just to address the last sentence: the Apache Software Foundation would never adopt Commons Clause. It's antithetical to the ASF's entire licensing strategy, which is to give stuff away for the public good, with as few restrictio
12.
by ShaneCurcuru 9y ago
You have to have a license to attract contributors. https://choosealicense.com/ and github make it easy; there's zero excuse to not have a license. Permissive licenses attract the broadest range of contributors, so
13.
SFLC vs. Conservancy – Bryan Lunduke Coverage of Trademark Battle(lunduke.com)
5 points by ShaneCurcuru 9y ago|0 comments
14.
by ShaneCurcuru 9y ago
I've been blogging on the facts, with sources wherever possible: https://communityovercode.com/2017/11/legal-issues-software-... And previous posts on the basics and a timeline. It's complicated - both
15.
by ShaneCurcuru 9y ago
Still developing story, but this shows reason #67 why trademarks are more important than most devs think. Another interesting discussion is on LWN: lwn.net/Articles/738046/
16.
by ShaneCurcuru 11y ago
Just a general comment about the whole thread: trademark law is far more complicated and particular than you know (unless you're an IP lawyer; then you might appreciate it). Not only are developers used to problems that can have prova
17.
by ShaneCurcuru 11y ago
USPTO Trademark Pro Tip: search links are session specific. Use the blue TSDR button's link instead: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=86930821&caseType=SERIAL_...
18.
by ShaneCurcuru 11y ago
Indeed, Hormel once sent nastygrams about their trademark to the ASF over our Apache SpamAssassin software. Trademark owners can ask everyone to use or not use their own names. Actually going to court - or actually winning - is far far
19.
by ShaneCurcuru 11y ago
Good question. Under something like GPL or Apache, npm (or anyone, really) would have a clear legal reason to continue using and redistributing the code; there's nothing the copyright holder can do about that (unless you actually viol
20.
by ShaneCurcuru 11y ago
Trademarks: even more understood to modern programmers than C++ multiple inheritance. Trademark owners - especially registered ones - can ask you to treat their mark any way they like. Legally, they can only try to enforce the basics of