Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Senderman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Senderman
9y ago
Get involved in what; where? Unspecific suggestions like this are the reason people get lost and resume the attitude you're deriding.
62.
▲
by
Senderman
9y ago
I'm pretty sure the original post is asking what's in that alleged mountain.
63.
▲
by
Senderman
9y ago
At the risk of going off-topic, I loved your usage of the word 'current' before 'opinion', and I'm going to adopt it.
64.
▲
by
Senderman
9y ago
I'm sure someone will find a use for it.
65.
▲
by
Senderman
9y ago
Instead of the explanation you've asked the internet for, you might find a visit to L.A., to clear up your puzzlement, more rewarding.
66.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
They're called neural networks because their design mirrors observations from neurons in the brain. There's truth to your sentiment, that the current level of knowledge is always somewhat arbitrary, but to say there's "n
67.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
Yours is a point of view I've rarely heard. It's quite inspiring. I suppose I'm encouraged that you've reduced 'chatter' and its avoidance to something that can be managed.
68.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I followed this up until the final comment, which seemed to come out of nowhere. Each human doesn't provide the same value to each scenario. Case in point, your opening sentence singled out "radicals" as having an entirely se
69.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I've found that being quick to say "I don't know", "I haven't heard of that before", etc. in environments where people are often afraid to say as such, tends to pleasantly surprise people, and actually ear
70.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
It sounds like you're confusing will power with obedience.
71.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
"sweat" is poetry/metaphor in this context, too, so your description and the previous one are equally valid "in reality."
72.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I'm pretty sure they wouldn't want you to think about it at all.
73.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
Sounds like OC's day-job has placed them on the boundary of de Sitter space, then.
74.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
One day you'll find the time.
75.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I was raised Catholic•, in Ireland. The entire narrative is built around the idea of going to heaven while ~all the bad people~ burn forever elsewhere. From what I can see, in the context of the church, "Forgiveness" is a means of
76.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
>Well he had a Nobel prize in physics on his hands for starters, that's one way to tell the difference. With the preface that I know that a higher calibre of comment is expected from me in this community, it's still the truth:
77.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I'm sure that's true. But it doesn't change my core argument: Every time we write something that reaches a wider audience (social-media-randoms and pseudo-randoms alike), we have an opportunity to stress to the reader that th
78.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
You know, this all sounds right, but so did the alleged "bad" advice at first. There's a lot of uncertainty about this topic right now, and the author fails to point to any examples or experiences from real-actual-travels t
79.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
DA has always had a culture of being a safe place online to post something you've made without fear of ridicule. I joined in 2001 as a person-who-liked-drawing but had no scanner, so I tried out writing, since that was a category on th
80.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
Your dad sounds cool.
81.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
You're right that the discussion is leaning to the fictional side, but to be fair, the article falls into this trap as well. I don't think it's disregard, I think it's practicality… The fact is the movie is the only shar
82.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I had the same problem; This cleared it up: http://jupyter.org
83.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
I've had this on in the background as a nice-screensaver of sorts for a few weeks now; I'd say it spends 1/8th of its time showing that 'back soon' screen.
84.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
This joke isn't working for me. Is it working for anybody else?
85.
▲
by
Senderman
10y ago
> maybe the universe itself doesn't have the resources for a computer that can calculate the quantum superposition of macroscopic objects If we indulge this line of imagination a little further, where some types of quantum state &#x