Scion9066

8 ms·

61.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Looks like it should be mandatory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SBC_%28codec%29 As of A2DP version 1.3, the Low Complexity Subband Coding remains the default codec and its implementation is mandatory for devices supp
62.
by Scion9066 3y ago
In order to get the information such as the name of the torrent and its files from the hash you do need to connect to someone in the swarm to download that metadata. You won't know what it is until after you've already connected.
63.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Yes. The penalty for ignoring DMCA takedowns is losing the DMCA safe harbors that protect them from copyright infringement liability. With statutory damages of $30k per work for non-willful infringement, any company that hosts user generate
64.
by Scion9066 3y ago
One thing that I think people forget about is that the prompt used when "reproduc[ing] those same copyrighted works" is also a part of why it spits out similar things. It's not just the model doing it. A traditional artist ca
65.
by Scion9066 3y ago
The EFF's post about it at each of the three steps of obtaining, training, and generating an output image: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/how-we-think-about-cop... It's an interesting read an
66.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Yep, but apparently SCOTUS doesn't dispute that fallacy: https://www.aclu.org/cases/moore-v-united-states https://www.aclum.org/en/press-releases/us-supreme-court-dec... In the case, Mo
67.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Doesn't need to be "AI" despite the bill's name (link to page that has link to draft of the bill): http://salazar.house.gov/media/press-releases/salazar-introd... (a) DEFINITIONS.-In this Act:
68.
by Scion9066 3y ago
I'm wondering if you could use something like FlareSolverr to bypass the Cloudflare CAPTCHAs. I'm a little surprised an RSS feed itself would be rate limited/protected though.
69.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Google definitely can't just block third-party cookies on their own: https://blog.google/products/chrome/privacy-sandbox-tracking... On January 4, we'll begin testing Tracking Protection, a new feature
70.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Yep, it's basically the reasoning behind why Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was created in the states: In Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. they didn't moderate and were not liable as a publisher because they did not h
71.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Because Chrome doesn't produce any revenue directly and wouldn't survive as a separate company?
72.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Don't worry, Star Trek in the Discovery Channel style will be fine. The Discovery Channel is still all about exploration and learning, so it will be a good fit, right? /s
73.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Because it might not end up being a choice of which store to get things from like your physical goods example. For the larger apps/those from specific publishers it may likely be a choice of: Meta apps only from the Meta Store, Epic Ga
74.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Because otherwise you have to host everything yourself somehow, including stuff like the comment you just posted, because no one would be willing to accept the liability involved.
75.
by Scion9066 3y ago
The problem with that that I see is that not everyone wants to or can be their own service provider and many would end up with nowhere to post without things in the cloud.
76.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Because the alternatives were decided in: Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. which held that a service that lets everything be unmoderated was not liable. and Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. which held that a service that did mod
77.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Section 230 was explicitly about allowing service providers to act in an editorial capacity, allowing them to remove content that they deemed offensive. The alternative was what happened in two court cases: moderate things and be liable for
78.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Isn't that worse though since your data would be spread across multiple potentially untrustworthy parties instead of just a single one? Given how many requests a browser makes and normal browsing habits like regularly visiting the same
79.
by Scion9066 3y ago
It isn't the manifest version directly that is doing this, just the permissions/api changes that are happening at the same time. Firefox for example is keeping the old style as an option while still implementing support for MV3 an
80.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Switching to an extension providing a list of things to block or redirect to the browser rather than the extension having access to all content on every page that you visit. I'd imagine that people don't vet extensions nearly as m
81.
by Scion9066 3y ago
The video is what had a link to the memo and is what pointed out the apparent contradiction. The memo is from half a decade ago and what alexanderhanff was able to get them to say in the referenced letter was separate[0]. It will probably n
82.
by Scion9066 3y ago
From the linked EU memo in the YouTube description: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_1... Can users still use ad blockers? The proposal does not regulate the use of ad blocke
83.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Previous discussion of this topic: Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection scripts under EU law https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38050838
84.
by Scion9066 3y ago
It would be, but so would any of the EU state controlled ones, even if that's not what you use for your domain. The main problem isn't that it puts any limits on what you can use as a CA but rather that it mandates some of what ev
85.
by Scion9066 3y ago
From Mozilla's post: The text goes on to ban browsers from applying security checks to these EU keys and certificates except those pre-approved by the EU’s IT standards body - ETSI.
86.
by Scion9066 3y ago
But that would mean Google would have to send some kind of signal to Google's servers that you're using Incognito. Imagine the headline: Chrome tells Google (and only Google) when you're using Incognito mode I'd imagine
87.
by Scion9066 3y ago
They don't have a way to detect whether you are using Incognito or not, so they can't treat those people's browsing data differently. When there is a way, they patch it: https://blog.google/outreach-initiative
88.
by Scion9066 3y ago
They've been there in some form for a very long time (see the ancient screenshot here): https://www.chromium.org/user-experience/incognito/
89.
by Scion9066 3y ago
VNC and the like are basically just transmitting the framebuffer to the client. There are some extensions for stuff like better support for video though. RDP works a bit differently: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/wi
90.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Couldn't that be the Mullvad Browser which is based on the Tor Browser?

More ›