Scion9066

11 ms·

91.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Generally you'd get a network prefix from your ISP of 56 to 60 bits, your router would handle deciding how to make a network out of the remaining 4 to 8 bits of the network part, and then devices would automatically assign themselves u
92.
by Scion9066 3y ago
It might be able to do this with the Bittorent V2 format as the hashes would be per file.
93.
by Scion9066 3y ago
They can't scan them in the cloud because, unlike other cloud storage services, the data is encrypted before leaving the device and they don't have access to what they are storing. They still don't want to host bad stuff thou
94.
by Scion9066 3y ago
https://www.polygon.com/23873727/unity-credible-death-threat... > Update: San Francisco police told Polygon that officers responded to Unity’s San Francisco office “regarding a threats incident.” A “reporting party”
95.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Nothing, they just get randomized ads based on those topics in response.
96.
by Scion9066 3y ago
You can find the normal user view at: chrome://settings/adPrivacy/interests or look under the hood and play around with the classifier at: chrome://topics-internals/ I don't think you'll see anyt
97.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Regarding the option of Google ceasing all behavior-based tracking to avoid competition issues: I doubt they could do that to the ad industry unilaterally. Even if they would then be following the same rules themselves, I don't think t
98.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Even if Google did not have the privacy sandbox features, they would still have first-party cookies and enough data from the services they run (Search, YouTube, etc). This puts Google in a different position than what Apple did and means th
99.
by Scion9066 3y ago
They have to set up the replacement (topics API) before they get rid of the previous solution (third-party cookies). Sites need time to adjust and implement the new systems. They also need to not make sweeping changes to the ad industry tha
100.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Not yet but they can't just turn off third party cookies arbitrarily in their browser without giving time for sites and advertisers to update their systems to account for the removal. They're already facing anticompetitive/mo
101.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Because not everyone wants to use the Tor network but may still be interested in a browser that comes configured for as much privacy as possible by default instead of having to configure various settings/extensions manually? Options fo
102.
by Scion9066 3y ago
That's an edge case made specifically to be MITM'd by the network you're on. It's also a pretty good example of what someone with control of the network can do to any non-encrypted connection.
103.
by Scion9066 3y ago
I figured most people looking to do this at home wouldn't have a home MDM solution to deploy it with. You're right though that it could probably be done with Apple Configurator fairly easily.
104.
by Scion9066 3y ago
You can right click on the address bar and check the option "Always show full URLs" if you want to see the protocol still. They're making these changes for the average user who doesn't know the difference and who can&#x2
105.
by Scion9066 3y ago
But you generally can't copyright the underlying facts, only the creative expression in the article/work itself. If they can get it to extract just the facts and how they relate to one another, that wouldn't really be protect
106.
by Scion9066 3y ago
You can use it for certificates, it just looks like there's an extra step to say that you really trust it as a root: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204477
107.
by Scion9066 3y ago
There has been a case about removing books potentially violating the first amendment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_Trees_School_District_v... https://www.britannica.com/topic/Board-of-Educa
108.
by Scion9066 3y ago
And would it even be possible to have their web tracking things behave differently between normal and incognito modes? I think we'd all be worse off if sites could detect privacy-related features like that.
109.
by Scion9066 3y ago
The problem is how does the tracking that Google's ad/analytics businesses use know that the Chrome browser on your computer is running in Incognito mode? Chrome and other browsers don't give a way for websites to detect it (
110.
by Scion9066 3y ago
The Play Store version is definitely just running the mobile app version on a large laptop screen. This version is just using the ability to run Linux apps to run the normal desktop version of Firefox directly (albeit in a VM like all the L
111.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Funnily enough, the T480 is also on the supported models list for ChromeOS Flex and supported until at least 2028 so it'd probably make a pretty good Chromebook: https://support.google.com/chromeosflex/answer/
112.
by Scion9066 3y ago
They've had at least one experiment where they blocked the web version as well and tried to direct people to the app: https://www.reddit.com/r/help/comments/135tly1/helpdid_reddi... HN discussion at
113.
by Scion9066 3y ago
I'm not sure why them being employees would change their liability since section 230 was explicitly set up to protect moderation decisions by the host. As long as the content is created by third parties and they aren't the ones cr
114.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Have you tried it recently? I believe they require a phone number now.
115.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Attestation is more like: The passkey is from this model of security key/phone. That can then be used to have a list of allowed devices if you really need hardware backed security for example (eg you provide all your users in your org
116.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Basically, for hardware backed devices like phones and physical security keys, there's an attestation certificate that is shared by all devices of that model. This can allow a site that wants higher security for some reason to require
117.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Looks like it's similar to the idea behind mailto links and you'll need to have something setup to handle that protocol (either a website or an app): https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/blob/main&#x
118.
by Scion9066 3y ago
You don't have to enable the biometric part of this as you can still protect your device with a passcode/password only if you want. I just tested it and was able to use it with just my device PIN, no biometrics. The part about not
119.
by Scion9066 3y ago
Pretty sure that's intentional. It's replacing something you know (a word) with something you have (a key stored on a device or some kind of account). It doesn't necessarily need to use biometrics or be bound to a specific de
120.
by Scion9066 3y ago
If you don't use biometrics then it's passwords or passcodes to authenticate to the local device or a secondary device to unlock it. After that it uses public key cryptography to do the actual authentication with the site you&#x27

More ›