Satifer

6 ms·

1.
by Satifer 11y ago
... there is just so much wrong with that editorial
2.
by Satifer 11y ago
"...or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited." How is this a bad thing? The original investigators - as scientists and seekers of the valid, the factual, the accurate - should welcome com
3.
by Satifer 11y ago
Satifer, REMOTE. INTERNS. We are developing the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. Internships: web developers and
4.
by Satifer 11y ago
that should work. we'll have to see how popular this idea gets. shouldn't be too hard, given that many threads have 200+ upvotes daily
5.
by Satifer 11y ago
Strange - maybe there's a better alternative to tinychat?
6.
by Satifer 11y ago
Many of us login several times a day, and spend at least several minutes reading and commenting. Let's set up web/videochats with 1 hr advance warning on topics of interest. Many think this could be very beneficial to this communi
7.
Ask HN: HN Videochats on demand? Rooms by topic? Let's set some ground rules(tinychat.com)
5 points by Satifer 11y ago|6 comments
8.
by Satifer 11y ago
What are your thoughts on publishing failed experiment data and methods? Any have experience doing this?
9.
by Satifer 11y ago
We are developing the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. We welcome any questions or suggestions - we're looki
10.
Satifer to “publish” Failed Experiments on open science platform(satifer.com)
5 points by Satifer 11y ago|2 comments
11.
by Satifer 11y ago
^ This. Send us mail at contact@satifer.com if you want to talk about any of these. We're working on fixing "we never see research with unexciting results" and a few others. We've set up an email list, we're hoping
12.
by Satifer 11y ago
We are developing the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. We welcome any questions or suggestions - we're looki
13.
Satifer is building the platform for Open Science (we're hiring)(satifer.com)
2 points by Satifer 11y ago|1 comments
14.
by Satifer 11y ago
We are developing the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. We welcome any questions or suggestions - we're looki
15.
Satifer is redesigning interaction with academic publications (we're hiring)(satifer.com)
2 points by Satifer 11y ago|1 comments
16.
by Satifer 11y ago
We are developing the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. We welcome any questions or suggestions - we're looki
17.
Satifer is redesigning interaction with academic publications (we're hiring)(satifer.com)
2 points by Satifer 11y ago|1 comments
18.
by Satifer 11y ago
Interesting article. What I have in mind is the instances when I read a paper (read: dozens of papers on a refined area), the methods section leaves out 10-99% of the details, and I spend significant time and effort searching for the detail
19.
by Satifer 11y ago
Michael Eisen is fantastic. There's a dramatic drop-off as far as public engagement of scientists goes. I'm not concerned only with "public" engagement, but informal discussion amongst a diverse crowd of academics.
20.
by Satifer 11y ago
Thanks for your input. Right, people tend to bring these up on Facebook, but it's typically a scattered discussion. Are there any Facebook Groups in particular that you know of that facilitate informed, rational discussion?
21.
by Satifer 11y ago
We are the future of reading and writing academic publications. HN attracts a talented audience. Let us know at contact@satifer.com if you're interested in our work. ("HN" in the subject line) We welcome any questions or sugg
22.
Satifer is hiring. Stealth mode. Academic Publications(satifer.com)
3 points by Satifer 11y ago|1 comments
23.
by Satifer 11y ago
Yes. The two you mentioned seem fairly outdated in terms of UI/UX and functionality.
24.
by Satifer 11y ago
Discussion is paramount to both ideation and understanding. Why don't we see more public discussions among academics?
25.
Where do scientists comment on publications?
7 points by Satifer 11y ago|12 comments