SarikayaKomzin

7 ms·

31.
by SarikayaKomzin 6y ago
I got a 404, so I did a quick Google search. This seems to be the article in question —> https://onezero.medium.com/the-case-for-stanislaw-lem-one-of... I am excited to read it. I just finished reading Solaris for the fi
32.
by SarikayaKomzin 6y ago
This is more advice than a technique, so take it for what it’s worth. Show some self-compassion and don’t be too hard on yourself. The fact that you’re actively pursuing knowledge puts you ahead of a lot of other people. Also, take time to
33.
by SarikayaKomzin 7y ago
> One key part is that naming is important. This is always a fight I am willing to take. Acronyms, fantasy names, names of teams or legacy names that does not represent the functionality of the micro-service plague many companies. > I
34.
by SarikayaKomzin 7y ago
I meant "conclusions this could lead to". Not sure how I ended up with the above. Sorry about that.
35.
by SarikayaKomzin 7y ago
Yeah. I shared that quote as an example of the “terrifying” conclusions this good lead one to, not necessarily because I though his reactionary stance was true (or useful, haha). But maybe the success of representative democracy is not base
36.
by SarikayaKomzin 7y ago
Indeed. This is why it often seems like anything built up rationally can be tore down rationally. This leads some to the interesting (and perhaps terrifying) conclusion that narratives are more important and useful than rationalism. Example
37.
by SarikayaKomzin 7y ago
I like this. Reminds me a bit of another useful triad for software, the Vitruvian principles in architecture: firmitatis (stability), utilitatis (utility), et venustatis (beauty).