Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Sapere_Aude
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
11mo ago
"Chosen" by an impersonal process? You guys have entered the domain of philosophy a long time ago and didn't realize it, thinking it is still empirical science.
2.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
2y ago
Why do people still waste time and money on these post hoc theories of Dark Matter / Dark Energy, which were invented to explain anomalies in the conventional cosmological model like galaxy rotation curves? We neither have direct evide
3.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
3y ago
So what? It doesn't even harm them financially. The EU Suppressed a 300-Page Study That Found Piracy Doesn’t Harm Sales https://gizmodo.com/the-eu-suppressed-a-300-page-study-that-...
4.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
3y ago
Nice! Now people can finally eat tumors with chicken texture. Thank God this stuff isn't econonically viable, nor is it in any way "sustainable". This is processed foods par excellence.
5.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
4y ago
Right around the time when the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome and other elitist think tanks / NGOs were founded to push globalization, development and such ideas.
6.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
4y ago
There isn't even evidence that depression is caused by serotonin levels. They never even checked that out in the first place. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2022/jul/no-evidence-depression-c... https:/
7.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
4y ago
Utilitarianistic approaches are really bad... Scientism falls flat on its face, since it's a self refuting philosophy(!). It's truth cannot be demonstrated according to its own principles, (i.e. hard sciences are the best / s
8.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
5y ago
I love material reductionism. It pretends to explain the thing it actually renders meaningless with its "explanation". This "explanation" is utter rubbish mumbled by the philsophically inept. It even pretends to be &qu
9.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
5y ago
No, of course it's not my sole argument. I have more than two dozens well researched books full with arguments for and mostly against this bunk science which is underpinning "climate change" and the CO2 lie. I just don't
10.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
5y ago
Please lead me to some examples for your claims, if you have them, so I can make up my mind and re-evaluate my stance, if you're correct. I'd appreciate it.
11.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
5y ago
Sounds like more patchwork crap for a failed model...
12.
▲
by
Sapere_Aude
5y ago
Why don't you peeps check out some of the explanations coming from plasma physicists and electric engineers that have oberserved similarities between their fields of expertise and things going on on earth, it's atmosphere and spac