SamoyedFurFluff

107 ms·

1441.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
> If a restaurant welcomes takeaway orders then whether you order and collect in person or hire someone to do it on your behalf is irrelevant. This is a big if, because existing outcry already belies that this assumption is actually not
1442.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
Are you a delivery platform? The law only applies to delivery platforms. If you want to hire an individual contractor(or just casually pay your buddy 3$ to pick up a pizza for you) you can still do so.
1443.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
So the alternative should be that we should continue to funnel VC money into every new predatory impersonation business? Sometimes it really is a loophole that is now closed, and the government can’t subsequently dissolve all companies they
1444.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
No, but this protects small restaurant owners regardless if they are a legal entity with trademarks to protect.
1445.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
> Not to mention, of course, any new entrants! This law will make it much harder to compete with "the next Doordash". Well of course the law will make it much harder to compete to be the next predatory, deceitful company that
1446.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
> And has a clear disclaimer that they're not affiliated with the businesses. This isn’t actually clear. GrubHub’s about page: “ Grubhub is a leading online and mobile food-ordering and delivery marketplace with the largest and most
1447.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
Part of this is that it’s really expensive to litigate that nuance in court because even if you believe you’re correct, a company like GrubHub can continue to do business for years and years while dragging this out through the courts. Esp
1448.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
I dont know if a case where Apple hired ethicists and then fired them for their research? Admittedly apple also doses all their employees with NDAs up the wazoo so we simply can’t know these things.
1449.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
There is in fact indication that journalists have at least been targeted in Portland according to an ACLU case, which results in a judge putting a restraining order on the police. I’m not a law person, so if you know better on the nuances p
1450.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
Wasn’t there a thing where the police arrested press on national tv, with badges and everything? Didn’t a photographer for the news have their eye shot out by police? Who can trust any claims that they aren’t targeting journalists to arrest
1451.
by SamoyedFurFluff 6y ago
The author is claiming that dogs are rare in shelters now and that institutions are actively buying them from the same puppy mills that are being detracted. I can’t see that to be true- look at villa lobos rescue with over 130 pit bulls, an