Rygu

18 ms·

121.
by Rygu 12y ago
From an engineer's point of view, it was probably either change the algorithm or increase exposure. I don't think they've done both, so I would say it's just the extra exposure.
122.
by Rygu 12y ago
That is kind of confusing isn't it, because there's also a miner fee. Does your algorithm know how to subtract the miner fee to get the unique amount? Also, are your floating point operations (subtract, compare) done correctly? h
123.
by Rygu 12y ago
Are their APIs and Sign in with Facebook, also down? That's pretty messed up for all the sites that rely on their Sign in.
124.
by Rygu 12y ago
I'm starting to believe that we have a .com-like scarcity problem with programming project names... Smarty PHP templates: http://www.smarty.net/
125.
by Rygu 12y ago
Not sure what kind of applications he expects to build, but picking a "Web" Framework for the next decade should probably also include a Javascript framework that allows more app-y websites. Clients are already falling for those.
126.
by Rygu 12y ago
I see it differently. To me there's a parallel between open source software and decentralized systems. Both have two sides. On one side you'll have the low-profile hackers and early/autonomous adopters who act as the driving
127.
by Rygu 12y ago
Having worked with the Blockchain.info API, I am quite disappointed that Chain.com (great domain name!) haven't put much effort into building a better, more developer-friendly API. I mean returning variables named "n" and som
128.
Dutch payment provider Mollie has integrated Bitcoin payment method(dl.dropboxusercontent.com)
1 points by Rygu 12y ago|0 comments
129.
by Rygu 12y ago
That might take a few browser generations sadly. HTML6 anyone? edit: HTML/next apparently: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/next
130.
CVE-2014-0130 Rails vulnerability exposes arbitrary files on server(openwall.com)
1 points by Rygu 12y ago|0 comments
131.
by Rygu 12y ago
Developers will love it. For what it's worth Stash fits perfectly in our review process where anyone can be assigned to review and comment on code. The pull request diff explorer makes it super easy to track which files have been revie
132.
by Rygu 12y ago
We use and love Atlassian Stash ( https://www.atlassian.com/software/stash ), it's excellent for code reviews. The diff view options and commenting make it easy to create pull requests, get feedback and eventually m
133.
by Rygu 12y ago
Can someone explain why not simply use "grep -ri license ." ?
134.
by Rygu 12y ago
I'm sorry that you don't see much fault with it. I've tried my best to explain.
135.
by Rygu 12y ago
How are [0] and [1] non-issues? I like my libraries "SOLID" and "Clean" (look em up). I have worked with Marionette's source, and it's neither. Point [2] means, to use a different renderer you need to replace M
136.
by Rygu 12y ago
Marionette is terrible. The code is a mess: prototypes defined within instances [0]. Uninformed use of design patterns: controllers are what, just namespaces? [1] Unmodular internals, almost like globals [2]. It's not worth a compariso
137.
by Rygu 12y ago
Continuing this point, Backbone requires rendering, binding, and probably relational models libraries. Not to mention the boilerplate and configuration code you have to write to tie all those libraries together. Less may end up being more.
138.
by Rygu 13y ago
See that the memcmp() comparison takes longer as you guess the next byte correctly. Repeat until all bytes known.
139.
by Rygu 13y ago
Yes, it's just as funny as cafebabe... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexspeak
140.
by Rygu 13y ago
Go vs Java? Choose the right tool depending on your experience with either and the goal of your project. They're really different beasts. Go (2007) focuses on concurrency, is relatively young, and is compiled to machine code for native
141.
by Rygu 13y ago
In the Top 10 things people first do on new hardware (desktop, laptop, tablet or phone): Installing Dropbox. Google must to invest more in improving the Web and native Google Drive clients if they want to beat Dropbox. Pricing is just a c
142.
by Rygu 13y ago
Reminds me of this: http://web.archive.org/web/20071219073644/http://jyte.com/ Back in the day when OpenID was still the future.
143.
by Rygu 13y ago
> Nemisis7654 said: ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7391380 ) > There is also the excellent Genymotion emulator. > http://www.genymotion.com/ Genymotion deserves to be mentioned in a top level
144.
by Rygu 13y ago
A good IDE with an advanced toolchain is not hip, nope I give you that. But it just works.
145.
by Rygu 13y ago
I assume those prices are monthly fees? Anyway I don't like the idea of anonymous spending for the sake of anonymity. It is a "feature" of the Bitcoin currency, but if they really want to support the Bitcoin currency couldn
146.
by Rygu 13y ago
Couldn't you just give those conversations an Unreplied label? It will show up on the left. Gmail's labeling system is probably the most useful but overlooked feature they have.
147.
by Rygu 13y ago
1. Start writing tests. Tests will save your ass when you're merging a feature branch. Cause are you sure everything still behaves correctly after those ingenious refactorings? 2. Use an IDE and/or compiler that actually warns you
148.
by Rygu 13y ago
You're missing the validation parts.
149.
by Rygu 13y ago
You're not going to homebrew a more secure solution than the paid professors. It's a hard problem even to them.
150.
by Rygu 13y ago
I guess Hollywood started it.

More ›