Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rudybega
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Rudybega
1mo ago
This is only true if they can't saturate token production with a model that does less superfluous things. Given that they can (they're hilariously compute strained), having a model that solves tasks more quickly adds way more perc
2.
▲
by
Rudybega
3mo ago
This feels like a missed opportunity for an OpenAI Nintendo Power Glove collab. Smh.
3.
▲
by
Rudybega
3mo ago
This seems hilariously, extremely revisionist. Hell, the Opus 4.5 moment was only last November, and that was when agentic coding and most coding CLI tools became truly first class options. That's a wild paradigm shift. Hell, GPT-5 w
4.
▲
by
Rudybega
3mo ago
That's precisely what's going to happen.
5.
▲
by
Rudybega
3mo ago
I mean, it makes a lot of sense if the current administration operates in bad faith. I'll leave discerning that to you.
6.
▲
by
Rudybega
4mo ago
There's a huge exclusion. The 2026 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) allows qualifying U.S. expats to exclude up to $132,900 of foreign-earned income from their U.S. federal income taxes. Married couples can exclude up to $265,800
7.
▲
by
Rudybega
4mo ago
I mean, if you take HN commenters to have the thoughtfulness and foresight of children, then the word kind of works.
8.
▲
by
Rudybega
4mo ago
I mean, if we're assuming they're just willing to lie and violate their own TOS then how could you ever be comfortable with them regardless of this 30 day period (or really any online service)? This seems like a bit of a silly ta
9.
▲
by
Rudybega
6mo ago
That's the nature of abstraction. Everything you create on a computer is built on a towering stack of black boxes.
10.
▲
by
Rudybega
7mo ago
Anthropic and the military had a contract. The military wanted to change the terms of that contract. Anthropic said no, which is their clearly defined contractual right. They got labeled a supply chain risk. How is this anything other than
11.
▲
by
Rudybega
7mo ago
You don't actually believe in the core tenets of the USA if you think that the government should have or should exercise unchecked, abusive power.
12.
▲
by
Rudybega
7mo ago
Then the government should end their contract with Anthropic. The terms of the contract were clear. Designating them a supply chain risk is unprecedented authoritarian strong-arming.
13.
▲
by
Rudybega
7mo ago
Well yeah, they're running a small, outdated, older model. That's not really the point. This approach can be used for better, larger, newer models.
14.
▲
by
Rudybega
7mo ago
If only there were some way to test it, like swapping the two nouns in the sentence. Alas.
15.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
If a passenger says to you, "go around this car by using that private driveway", are they driving the car?
16.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
There aren't remote "drivers" in the Philippines, that's not how Fleet Response works. You can see how it works here if you're curious: https://waymo.com/blog/2024/05/fleet-response
17.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
MMLU performance caps out around 90% because there are tons of errors in the actual test set. There's a pretty solid post on it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/163x2wc/philip_...
18.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
I mean, Waymo gives a lot of examples of the situations, in their blog post about Fleet Response where they detail this, released May 21, 2024. They're very explicit that the Waymo Driver autonomous system is in control the entire tim
19.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
TinyCC can't compile a modern linux kernel. It doesn't support a ton of the extensions they use. That Rust compiler similarly can't do it.
20.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
There are two compilers that can handle the Linux kernel. GCC and LLVM. Both are written in C, not Rust. It's "in distribution" only if you really stretch the meaning of the term. A generic C compiler isn't going to be
21.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
I think they immediately corrected their median timelines for takeoff to 2028 upon releasing the article (I believe there was a math mistake or something initially), so all those dates can probably be bumped back a few months. Regardless,
22.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
The denial of this overall trend on here and in other internet spaces is starting to really bother me. People need to have sober conversations about the speed of this increase and what kind of effects it's going to have on the world.
23.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
Direct transpilation would create a ton of unsafe code (this repo doesn't have any) and fixing that would require a lot of manual fixes from the model. Even that would be a massive achievement, but it's not how this was created.
24.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
You're comparing two different benchmarks. Pro vs Verified.
25.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
It wrote the compiler in Rust. As far as I know, there aren't any Rust based C compilers with the same capabilities. If you can find one that can compile the Linux kernel or get 99% on the GCC torture test suite, I would be quite surp
26.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
Yeah, I'm having the same issue. Disappointing limitations.
27.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
That's probably more a function of more people being in the road than people not understanding what object they're about to hit.
28.
▲
by
Rudybega
8mo ago
"Oh that obstructing object doesn't look like a child? Gun it, YOLO." Lmao. I suspect the cars are trying to avoid running into anything, as that's generally considered bad.
29.
▲
by
Rudybega
11mo ago
I wonder if you could get around this with a slightly more sophisticated harness. I suspect you're running into context length issues. Something like 1.) Split audio into multiple smaller tracks. 2.) Perform first pass audio extractio
30.
▲
by
Rudybega
11mo ago
Holy crap. That's actually kind of incredible for a first attempt.
More ›