Rohanarun

5 ms·

1.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
The day may come sooner than you expect though, because one of the "big players" is actively interested in the idea now.. Your concerns are all valid of course, but this is actually considered a better solution from the people wor
2.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
I agree any real car hack will likely not end well. This solution also introduces the possibility of a new vector for state sponsored attacks, which should be concerning to some. The utilitarian decision is still to upgrade everyone, becaus
3.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
That's very true, but in the alternative scenario, you would have citizens who never buy new cars driving in semi autonomous cities. No matter how hard it may be to get past the political problems, this solution would guarantee more li
4.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
That's a good point, thanks I'll add it to the post under the top arguments. My answer would be that the current upgrade speed is to buy a new car, and how many people do you expect will do that in 15 years? This alternative appro
5.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
If a car starts moving independent of a city's models, it would easy to identify as a possible hack in real time. If a car gets hacked independently, there may not be much evidence of how it happened. The idea is a city based system ca
6.
by Rohanarun 11y ago
Would appreciate any feedback on how to improve the simulation for testing. For now turning off traffic lights makes the efficiency go up by 10 cars/minute. It would be interesting to test real city models, and different traffic algori
7.
A Better Solution for Autonomous Cars(medium.com)
9 points by Rohanarun 11y ago|11 comments