Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RobIII
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Malware faking "Cloudflare Am I Human" get user to install virus @0:32 [video]
(youtube.com)
5 points
by
RobIII
2y ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
by
RobIII
2y ago
Interesting bit starts around 0:32 (ain't nobody got time for this, right?) This shows how malware pops up a dialog to "verify you are human"; something we've all seen in various different permutations. Sometimes we need
3.
▲
by
RobIII
3y ago
Don't know, because uuidv7 has been coming for ages... https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-u...
4.
▲
by
RobIII
3y ago
You could simply base32, base36 or base64 encode the UUID's (as an example). Other than that; in IE6 times URL's had a limitation of 1K or 4K or something around that lenght IIRC, so unless you're using dozens of UUID's
5.
▲
by
RobIII
6y ago
Do you have / did you have 2FA enabled? And, if not, why not?
6.
▲
by
RobIII
6y ago
> You know what I want? Schemas. I can see this work perfectly fine in typed languages like C#: `NestedText.Deserialize<T>("nestedtext")` where the deserialize method handles the actual mapping of nested text objects to `
7.
▲
by
RobIII
8y ago
Password entropy is another place where fractional bits can be encountered.
8.
▲
by
RobIII
10y ago
> None of my tools work with it, and now my browser has to run a bunch of js for something that's normally native and very fast. It's not that I don't agree with the general idea of your post, but I disagree with this part
9.
▲
by
RobIII
11y ago
Agreed, but maybe the other side (or any of the hops in between) have some weird and/or incorrect implementation on which the CRC/Checksum fails because the bit is set? I'm not sure what would happen if the bit is excluded
10.
▲
by
RobIII
11y ago
> I love that anyone's implemented it at all though Similarly I have had a page online for years (may still be, can't remember the exact url... so I'd have to dig a little) that was served with HTTP status 418 I'm
11.
▲
by
RobIII
11y ago
I'm not intimately familiar with the RFC's but you could argue that since that bit is technically `reserved` when it's set the packet is 'invalid' and thus should be dropped (by some manufacturers reasoning maybe, n
12.
▲
by
RobIII
11y ago
It was so good my brain corrected it several times before spotting it :D