Rhinozz

3 ms·

1.
FuckStalkerware pt. 6 – tattling on pcTattletale(maia.crimew.gay)
2 points by Rhinozz 2y ago|0 comments
2.
An analysis of the LetMeSpy breach – maia arson crimew(maia.crimew.gay)
17 points by Rhinozz 3y ago|2 comments
3.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
In the Daily Dot article above: > CommuteAir added that the server, which was taken offline prior to publication after being flagged by the Daily Dot, did not expose any customer information based on an initial investigation.
4.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
I'll add that while the OED dates the singular they to the mid-14th century (betw. 1335-1361), use as to avoid gendering an individual is found from ca. 1450; the OED also gives earlier attestations for them (1429) and their (139
5.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
In the aforementioned Daily Dot article: > CommuteAir added that the server, which was taken offline prior to publication after being flagged by the Daily Dot, did not expose any customer information based on an initial investigation. As
6.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
>>Remember the gatekeeper is now [...] unemployed [...] who "know lot's of things about cyber security" according to [its] main page. Seems likely a competent bad actor could easily impersonate a well-meaning reporter..
7.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
The Daily Dot article specifies that it's the United States' (the Terrorist Screening Center's).
8.
by Rhinozz 4y ago
No, 'it' is not the same as 'they' here. To refer to a person of unknown pronouns, they/them/their/theirs/themself should be used. However, if one's pronouns are specified to be either they/